Dirty workers: What do we know about the ecotoxicological studies in polychaetes?

IF 1.7 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY

Aquatic Ecology Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1007/s10452-023-10049-3

Thayanne Medeiros Aguiar, Vanessa Fernández-Rodríguez, Cinthya Simone Gomes Santos

{"title":"Dirty workers: What do we know about the ecotoxicological studies in polychaetes?","authors":"Thayanne Medeiros Aguiar, Vanessa Fernández-Rodríguez, Cinthya Simone Gomes Santos","doi":"10.1007/s10452-023-10049-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We identified publication trends and methodological changes in polychaete ecotoxicological studies since the review carried out by Reish and Gerlinger (Bull Mar Sci 60:584–607, 1997) using a classic review approach. We also carried out a meta-analysis to identify the overall effect of the type of pollutants (e.g., hydrocarbons, metals, pesticides) and to test the consistency of their effect at different levels of analysis (e.g., biochemical, physiological, behavioral) using 14 different biological responses (e.g., bioaccumulation, tolerance, enzymatic activity). A total of 136 articles met the selection criteria and were analyzed for the classic review. Main findings include: (1) studies focused on the effects of metals (48%), hydrocarbons (32%), and pesticides (20%); (2) sublethal effects were more frequent; and (3) the nereidid species <i>Hediste diversicolor</i> was the most studied species. For the meta-analysis, 27 articles met the selection criteria and a total of 168 effect sizes were calculated. The results from the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) indicated that the hydrocarbons have the strongest effect in polychaetes, while the most sensitive metric is behavior. Enzymatic activity and mortality represented the most sensitive biological responses to estimating the magnitude and direction of the effect. Finally, the tendencies observed in the classic review did not represent the strongest effects in the GLMMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8262,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Ecology","volume":"57 3","pages":"783 - 796"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10452-023-10049-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We identified publication trends and methodological changes in polychaete ecotoxicological studies since the review carried out by Reish and Gerlinger (Bull Mar Sci 60:584–607, 1997) using a classic review approach. We also carried out a meta-analysis to identify the overall effect of the type of pollutants (e.g., hydrocarbons, metals, pesticides) and to test the consistency of their effect at different levels of analysis (e.g., biochemical, physiological, behavioral) using 14 different biological responses (e.g., bioaccumulation, tolerance, enzymatic activity). A total of 136 articles met the selection criteria and were analyzed for the classic review. Main findings include: (1) studies focused on the effects of metals (48%), hydrocarbons (32%), and pesticides (20%); (2) sublethal effects were more frequent; and (3) the nereidid species Hediste diversicolor was the most studied species. For the meta-analysis, 27 articles met the selection criteria and a total of 168 effect sizes were calculated. The results from the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) indicated that the hydrocarbons have the strongest effect in polychaetes, while the most sensitive metric is behavior. Enzymatic activity and mortality represented the most sensitive biological responses to estimating the magnitude and direction of the effect. Finally, the tendencies observed in the classic review did not represent the strongest effects in the GLMMs.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

肮脏工人:我们对多毛动物的生态毒理学研究了解多少?

自Reish和Gerlinger（Bull-Mar Sci 60:584-6071997）使用经典综述方法进行综述以来，我们确定了多毛类生态毒理学研究的出版趋势和方法学变化。我们还进行了一项荟萃分析，以确定污染物类型（如碳氢化合物、金属、农药）的总体影响，并使用14种不同的生物反应（如生物累积性、耐受性、酶活性）在不同分析水平（如生化、生理学、行为学）上测试其影响的一致性。共有136篇文章符合入选标准，并进行了经典评论分析。主要发现包括：（1）研究重点是金属（48%）、碳氢化合物（32%）和杀虫剂（20%）的影响；（2）亚致死效应更为频繁；（3）研究最多的种为桔梗。在荟萃分析中，27篇文章符合选择标准，共计算了168个效应大小。广义线性混合模型（GLMM）的结果表明，碳氢化合物在多毛类中的作用最强，而最敏感的指标是行为。酶活性和死亡率是估计影响大小和方向最敏感的生物学反应。最后，在经典综述中观察到的趋势并不代表GLMM中最强的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Aquatic Ecology 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： Aquatic Ecology publishes timely, peer-reviewed original papers relating to the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. Papers on fundamental and applied novel research in both the field and the laboratory, including descriptive or experimental studies, will be included in the journal. Preference will be given to studies that address timely and current topics and are integrative and critical in approach. We discourage papers that describe presence and abundance of aquatic biota in local habitats as well as papers that are pure systematic. The journal provides a forum for the aquatic ecologist - limnologist and oceanologist alike- to discuss ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels from individuals to populations, to communities and entire ecosystems.