Thinking beyond If You Build It, They Will Come: Increasing Submissions to Campus Institutional Repositories

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Andrea M. Quinn, Andrea M. Quinn
{"title":"Thinking beyond If You Build It, They Will Come: Increasing Submissions to Campus Institutional Repositories","authors":"Andrea M. Quinn, Andrea M. Quinn","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2022.2082990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Institutional repositories have not lived up to their potential. Faculty consider preparing and submitting works to repositories onerous, they worry about making works freely available, and they fail to see benefits of submitting works to repositories. Nevertheless, opportunities to increase repository submissions exist, and IRs offer campuses a way to promote dissemination of research and scholarship while meeting user needs. This article identifies hurdles to getting faculty to submit works and highlights how librarians can leverage campus resources and address faculty priorities to increase submissions. Insights gathered via assessments of repository workflows, library processes, and communications with librarians at several U.S. universities are presented to support the conclusion that, to increase submissions, repository staff should leverage information channels, increase benefits associated with submitting works to the repository, and reduce costs associated with the submission process. By grounding the study’s approach in rational choice logic, the findings represent a broadly-applicable framework.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"29 1","pages":"97 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2082990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Institutional repositories have not lived up to their potential. Faculty consider preparing and submitting works to repositories onerous, they worry about making works freely available, and they fail to see benefits of submitting works to repositories. Nevertheless, opportunities to increase repository submissions exist, and IRs offer campuses a way to promote dissemination of research and scholarship while meeting user needs. This article identifies hurdles to getting faculty to submit works and highlights how librarians can leverage campus resources and address faculty priorities to increase submissions. Insights gathered via assessments of repository workflows, library processes, and communications with librarians at several U.S. universities are presented to support the conclusion that, to increase submissions, repository staff should leverage information channels, increase benefits associated with submitting works to the repository, and reduce costs associated with the submission process. By grounding the study’s approach in rational choice logic, the findings represent a broadly-applicable framework.
超越思考,如果你建造它,它们就会到来:向校园机构资料库提交的文件越来越多
摘要机构知识库没有发挥出它们的潜力。教员们认为准备作品并将其提交到存储库是繁重的,他们担心作品会免费提供,而且他们看不到将作品提交到存储馆的好处。尽管如此,仍然存在增加知识库提交量的机会,IR为校园提供了一种在满足用户需求的同时促进研究和学术传播的方式。这篇文章指出了让教师提交作品的障碍,并强调了图书馆员如何利用校园资源,解决教师优先事项,以增加提交量。通过评估存储库工作流程、图书馆流程以及与美国几所大学图书馆员的沟通收集的见解支持了这样一个结论,即为了增加提交量,存储库工作人员应该利用信息渠道,增加与向存储库提交作品相关的利益,并降低与提交流程相关的成本。通过将研究方法建立在理性选择逻辑的基础上,研究结果代表了一个广泛适用的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信