Evaluation Of Efficacy Of Chemo-mechanical Method Of Caries Removal Using BRIX- 3000 Compared To Conventional Excavation With Burs- A Randomized Controlled Trial – Original Research

Janani Balachandran Mds, Tazeen Raees Mds, Mahesh Rao Bds, Chitra Jayachandran Mds
{"title":"Evaluation Of Efficacy Of Chemo-mechanical Method Of Caries Removal Using BRIX- 3000 Compared To Conventional Excavation With Burs- A Randomized Controlled Trial – Original Research","authors":"Janani Balachandran Mds, Tazeen Raees Mds, Mahesh Rao Bds, Chitra Jayachandran Mds","doi":"10.33882/jida.14.25900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Aim\nThe study was designed as a randomized double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of chemo-mechanical method of caries removal using BRIX 3000 as compared to conventional excavation with burs.\n\nMethods\nThe double blind randomized control trial was performed using a split mouth design where patients with bilateral deep carious lesion underwent treatment with Brix 3000 on one side and high speed bur excavation with aerotar on the contralateral side. This was performed to compare the efficacy of Brix 3000 with the conventional high speed caries excavation using aerotar. Group 1 (G1 = 67 teeth) chemomechanical removal with Brix 3000 and Group 2 (G2= 67 teeth) high speed bur excavation with aerotar. The criteria assessed were the time (T) required for each protocol to be completed and pain perceived by the patient at the end of caries excavation.\n\nResults\nAll statistical analysis were done using (SPSS) version 17.0 statistics software. Independent sample t test and Mann Whitney U test were one to analyze the data.\n\nConclusions\nThough time taken for caries excavation was more using BRIX than the high speed procedures, there was less or no pain while caries excavation using BRIX 3000 along with more patient comfort and cooperation during procedure. From the current study, it was observed that BRIX 3000 can be considered as an effective alternative/adjuvant for caries removal in deep carious lesions as compared to aerosol inducing high speed rotary techniques.\n\nKeywords : Chemo-mechanical caries removal, non aerosol inducing caries removal techniques, COVID, BRIX 3000, randomised controlled trial, novel caries removal, dentin preservation.","PeriodicalId":76040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33882/jida.14.25900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction and Aim The study was designed as a randomized double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of chemo-mechanical method of caries removal using BRIX 3000 as compared to conventional excavation with burs. Methods The double blind randomized control trial was performed using a split mouth design where patients with bilateral deep carious lesion underwent treatment with Brix 3000 on one side and high speed bur excavation with aerotar on the contralateral side. This was performed to compare the efficacy of Brix 3000 with the conventional high speed caries excavation using aerotar. Group 1 (G1 = 67 teeth) chemomechanical removal with Brix 3000 and Group 2 (G2= 67 teeth) high speed bur excavation with aerotar. The criteria assessed were the time (T) required for each protocol to be completed and pain perceived by the patient at the end of caries excavation. Results All statistical analysis were done using (SPSS) version 17.0 statistics software. Independent sample t test and Mann Whitney U test were one to analyze the data. Conclusions Though time taken for caries excavation was more using BRIX than the high speed procedures, there was less or no pain while caries excavation using BRIX 3000 along with more patient comfort and cooperation during procedure. From the current study, it was observed that BRIX 3000 can be considered as an effective alternative/adjuvant for caries removal in deep carious lesions as compared to aerosol inducing high speed rotary techniques. Keywords : Chemo-mechanical caries removal, non aerosol inducing caries removal techniques, COVID, BRIX 3000, randomised controlled trial, novel caries removal, dentin preservation.
BRIX- 3000化学机械除龋法与传统牙刺法的疗效评价-随机对照试验-原创性研究
本研究是一项随机双盲试验,旨在评估BRIX 3000化学-机械法除龋与传统刺齿法除龋的效果。方法双侧深部龋齿患者采用裂口设计,采用双盲随机对照试验,一侧用Brix 3000治疗,对一侧用aerotar高速挖牙。这是为了比较Brix 3000与传统的使用航空焦油的高速龋齿挖掘的效果。组1 (G1 = 67牙)采用Brix 3000进行化学力学拔牙,组2 (G2= 67牙)采用aerotar进行高速拔牙。评估的标准是完成每个方案所需的时间(T)和患者在龋齿挖掘结束时感受到的疼痛。结果采用SPSS 17.0版统计软件进行统计分析。采用独立样本t检验和Mann Whitney U检验对数据进行分析。结论使用BRIX进行龋齿挖掘所花费的时间比使用高速方法要长,但BRIX 3000进行龋齿挖掘时疼痛较少或无疼痛,患者在手术过程中更加舒适和配合。从目前的研究中可以观察到,与气溶胶诱导的高速旋转技术相比,BRIX 3000可以被认为是深度龋齿病变的有效替代/辅助清除。关键词:化学机械除龋,非气溶胶诱导除龋技术,COVID, BRIX 3000,随机对照试验,新型除龋,牙本质保存
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信