{"title":"Lodgers, Landlords and Landladies in Georgian London","authors":"J. Boulton","doi":"10.1080/14780038.2022.2148609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European interactions with native peoples, such as the Miskito Indians and the Black Caribs, have sometimes emphasised local agency and negotiation, especially Peter Linebaugh’s latest study of Edward Marcus Despard and his clashes with the white Baymen or loggers in British Honduras in support of the Miskito. Once again, Rogers has little time for this. ‘Recent attempts to dress these Zambos and Amerindian Miskito as freedom-loving smallholders and fishermen outside the parameters of capitalism will not do’ (p. 164), he says, arguing instead that the Miskito ‘were hard-headed ethnic soldiers between empires, part of a predatory landscape of adventurers and slavers’. This is a bleak, desperate world he offers instead, in which the British cynically exploited the Miskitos and then abandoned them to their fate under the Spanish after 1783. Rogers, therefore, offers a powerful set of arguments and proofs, ones intended to shake the twin narratives he identifies of complacent British imperial nostalgia and triumphalism on the one hand, and the ‘identity politics and racial reductionism’ (p.10) of the Black Lives Matter movement and its fellow travellers on the other. This may limit its impact, but that would be regrettable, since Rogers offers a sober, serious attempt to assess the truth of these matters, one which tries to see the past on its own terms rather than reading modernity back into it. It does so though using much the same approach as its predecessors, a series of case studies – in some cases the same case studies – that have been used to make different points elsewhere. The interpretive and analytical mutability of such case studies, and the question of whether they are representative of wider experiences, suggest that this approach may be reaching its limits, and that a wider analytical framework is needed, one which can adequately contextualise and appropriately weight all of these singular experiences. For the meantime though, those looking for an alternative to existing interpretations will find much in this book that is of value.","PeriodicalId":45240,"journal":{"name":"Cultural & Social History","volume":"19 1","pages":"618 - 620"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural & Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2022.2148609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
European interactions with native peoples, such as the Miskito Indians and the Black Caribs, have sometimes emphasised local agency and negotiation, especially Peter Linebaugh’s latest study of Edward Marcus Despard and his clashes with the white Baymen or loggers in British Honduras in support of the Miskito. Once again, Rogers has little time for this. ‘Recent attempts to dress these Zambos and Amerindian Miskito as freedom-loving smallholders and fishermen outside the parameters of capitalism will not do’ (p. 164), he says, arguing instead that the Miskito ‘were hard-headed ethnic soldiers between empires, part of a predatory landscape of adventurers and slavers’. This is a bleak, desperate world he offers instead, in which the British cynically exploited the Miskitos and then abandoned them to their fate under the Spanish after 1783. Rogers, therefore, offers a powerful set of arguments and proofs, ones intended to shake the twin narratives he identifies of complacent British imperial nostalgia and triumphalism on the one hand, and the ‘identity politics and racial reductionism’ (p.10) of the Black Lives Matter movement and its fellow travellers on the other. This may limit its impact, but that would be regrettable, since Rogers offers a sober, serious attempt to assess the truth of these matters, one which tries to see the past on its own terms rather than reading modernity back into it. It does so though using much the same approach as its predecessors, a series of case studies – in some cases the same case studies – that have been used to make different points elsewhere. The interpretive and analytical mutability of such case studies, and the question of whether they are representative of wider experiences, suggest that this approach may be reaching its limits, and that a wider analytical framework is needed, one which can adequately contextualise and appropriately weight all of these singular experiences. For the meantime though, those looking for an alternative to existing interpretations will find much in this book that is of value.
欧洲人与土著人民的互动,如米斯基托印第安人和黑人加勒比人,有时强调当地的代理和谈判,特别是Peter Linebaugh对Edward Marcus Despard的最新研究,以及他与英属洪都拉斯的白人海湾人或伐木工为支持米斯基托人而发生的冲突。再一次,罗杰斯几乎没有时间做这件事他说,最近试图将这些赞比亚人和美洲印第安人米斯基托人打扮成资本主义之外热爱自由的小农户和渔民是行不通的”(第164页),相反,他认为米斯基托“是帝国之间头脑冷静的民族士兵,是冒险家和奴隶主掠夺性景观的一部分”。相反,他提供了一个凄凉、绝望的世界,在这个世界里,英国人玩世不恭地剥削米斯基托人,然后在1783年后将他们遗弃在西班牙人的统治下。因此,罗杰斯提供了一套强有力的论据和证据,一方面是他认为自满的英国帝国怀旧和必胜主义,另一方面是“黑人的命也是命”运动及其同行的“身份政治和种族还原论”(第10页)。这可能会限制其影响,但这将是令人遗憾的,因为罗杰斯提供了一种冷静、严肃的尝试来评估这些事情的真相,一种试图以自己的方式看待过去,而不是重新解读现代性的尝试,一系列案例研究——在某些情况下是相同的案例研究——被用来在其他地方提出不同的观点。这些案例研究的解释和分析的可变性,以及它们是否代表更广泛的经验的问题,表明这种方法可能已经达到了极限,需要一个更广泛的分析框架,一个能够充分将所有这些独特经验置于背景中并适当加权的框架。然而,与此同时,那些寻找现有解释的替代品的人会在这本书中找到很多有价值的东西。
期刊介绍:
Cultural & Social History is published on behalf of the Social History Society (SHS). Members receive the journal as part of their membership package. To join the Society, please download an application form on the Society"s website and follow the instructions provided.