Naming the Problem

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Devan Hawkins
{"title":"Naming the Problem","authors":"Devan Hawkins","doi":"10.1177/10482911221142305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The argument is clearly not scientifically sound. We all know that correlation does not mean causation. Even if there is some arbitrary point that can be defined as the “beginning” of capitalism, the question still remains about the extent to which any positive changes in well-being and health can be attributed to capitalism itself. However, the fact remains that life expectancy globally has increased dramatically over the past 200 years. So explaining why these advances have occurred is important both to ensure that these gains continue and so that these improvements can also occur in parts of the world that have not experienced similar growths in life expectancy. Fortunately, Steven Johnson makes a compelling case in Extra life: A short history of living longer for the variety of advances that have resulted in improved life expectancy over the past 200 years. In each chapter, Johnson documents an innovation that he argues contributed to these improvements in life expectancy. Far from suggesting that these advances are due to capitalism, Johnson’s book suggests that it has been capitalism itself that has created some of the most persistent challenges to health. In turn, many of the advances that have helped us live longer required actions of activists, doctors, and public health practitioners to counter these effects. As Johnson describes early in his book, for most of human history, especially since the agricultural revolution, there were no major changes in life expectancy: “millennia pass with almost no meaningful change, followed by a sudden, unprecedented spikes over the past two centuries (p. xxxi).” When these changes did begin to occur, they were not shared equally. While such a sad fact seem obvious to us now, where we have witnessed the most pernicious effects of the COVID-19 along with many other causes of death, like heart disease and cancer, fall disproportionately on the poor and disadvantaged, the reality of inequitable increases in life expectancy was not always apparent. In the 1960s, Johnson describes how researchers using death records from the British Aristocracy found how unequal life expectancy was:","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"324 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221142305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The argument is clearly not scientifically sound. We all know that correlation does not mean causation. Even if there is some arbitrary point that can be defined as the “beginning” of capitalism, the question still remains about the extent to which any positive changes in well-being and health can be attributed to capitalism itself. However, the fact remains that life expectancy globally has increased dramatically over the past 200 years. So explaining why these advances have occurred is important both to ensure that these gains continue and so that these improvements can also occur in parts of the world that have not experienced similar growths in life expectancy. Fortunately, Steven Johnson makes a compelling case in Extra life: A short history of living longer for the variety of advances that have resulted in improved life expectancy over the past 200 years. In each chapter, Johnson documents an innovation that he argues contributed to these improvements in life expectancy. Far from suggesting that these advances are due to capitalism, Johnson’s book suggests that it has been capitalism itself that has created some of the most persistent challenges to health. In turn, many of the advances that have helped us live longer required actions of activists, doctors, and public health practitioners to counter these effects. As Johnson describes early in his book, for most of human history, especially since the agricultural revolution, there were no major changes in life expectancy: “millennia pass with almost no meaningful change, followed by a sudden, unprecedented spikes over the past two centuries (p. xxxi).” When these changes did begin to occur, they were not shared equally. While such a sad fact seem obvious to us now, where we have witnessed the most pernicious effects of the COVID-19 along with many other causes of death, like heart disease and cancer, fall disproportionately on the poor and disadvantaged, the reality of inequitable increases in life expectancy was not always apparent. In the 1960s, Johnson describes how researchers using death records from the British Aristocracy found how unequal life expectancy was:
指出问题所在
这一论点显然没有科学依据。我们都知道相关性并不意味着因果关系。即使有一些武断的点可以被定义为资本主义的"开端",问题仍然是,福利和健康方面的任何积极变化在多大程度上可以归因于资本主义本身。然而,事实仍然是,在过去的200年里,全球的预期寿命急剧增加。因此,解释为什么会出现这些进步是很重要的,这不仅可以确保这些进步继续下去,而且也可以在世界上没有经历过类似预期寿命增长的地区取得这些改善。幸运的是,史蒂文·约翰逊在《额外的生命》一书中提出了一个令人信服的理由:在过去的200年里,各种各样的进步导致了预期寿命的提高,这是一段寿命延长的短暂历史。在每一章中,约翰逊都记录了一项创新,他认为这项创新对预期寿命的提高做出了贡献。约翰逊的书并没有暗示这些进步是由于资本主义,而是认为资本主义本身给健康带来了一些最持久的挑战。反过来,许多帮助我们延长寿命的进步需要活动家、医生和公共卫生从业人员的行动来抵消这些影响。正如约翰逊在书的开头所描述的那样,在人类历史的大部分时间里,尤其是农业革命以来,预期寿命没有发生重大变化:“几千年过去了,几乎没有什么有意义的变化,随后在过去的两个世纪里出现了一个突然的、前所未有的高峰(第32页)。”虽然这一可悲的事实现在对我们来说似乎是显而易见的,但我们目睹了COVID-19的最有害影响以及心脏病和癌症等许多其他死亡原因不成比例地落在穷人和弱势群体身上,但预期寿命不公平增长的现实并不总是显而易见的。在20世纪60年代,约翰逊描述了研究人员如何利用英国贵族的死亡记录发现预期寿命是多么不平等:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: New Solutions delivers authoritative responses to perplexing problems, with a worker’s voice, an activist’s commitment, a scientist’s approach, and a policy-maker’s experience. New Solutions explores the growing, changing common ground at the intersection of health, work, and the environment. The Journal makes plain how the issues in each area are interrelated and sets forth progressive, thoughtfully crafted public policy choices. It seeks a conversation on the issues between the grassroots labor and environmental activists and the professionals and researchers involved in charting society’s way forward with the understanding that lack of scientific knowledge is no excuse for doing nothing and that inaction is itself a choice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信