Factors Influencing Graduate Program Choice Among Undergraduate Women

B. Harrington, Halei C. Benefield, Brooke C. Matson, Rebecca E. Hamlin, Jennifer E. L. Diaz, Grace E Mosley, R. Cholera, A. Verde
{"title":"Factors Influencing Graduate Program Choice Among Undergraduate Women","authors":"B. Harrington, Halei C. Benefield, Brooke C. Matson, Rebecca E. Hamlin, Jennifer E. L. Diaz, Grace E Mosley, R. Cholera, A. Verde","doi":"10.31986/ISSN.2578-3343_VOL1ISS1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Despite equal enrollment proportions in MD and PhD programs, there are fewer women than men in MD-PhD programs and academic medicine. Factors important in degree program selection, including the perception of gender disparities, among undergraduate students were characterized.\n\nMethods: In 2017, women pre-health students at four public North Carolina universities were invited to participate in an online survey regarding career plans, decision factors, and perceptions of gender disparities in MD, PhD and MD-PhD pathways. This study characterizes factors important to program selection, and evaluates the association of intended graduate program with perceived gender disparities using Fisher’s exact tests.\nResults: Among the n=186 female survey participants, most were white (54 %) and intended MD, PhD, and/or MD-PhD programs (52 %). Sixty percent had heard of MD-PhD programs, over half had no research experience, and half were considering but uncertain about pursuing a research career. The most common factors influencing degree program choice were perceived competitiveness as an applicant, desired future work environment, and desire for patient interaction. Twenty-five percent of students considering MD, PhD, and MD-PhD programs stated that perceived gender disparities during training for those degrees will influence their choice of program, however intended degree was not statistically associated with perceived gender disparities.\n \nDiscussion: Perceived gender disparities may influence choice of graduate training program but are not among the top factors. Perceived competitiveness as an applicant is an important career consideration among undergraduate women. Strategies to increase awareness of MD-PhD programs, to encourage women to consider all training paths for which they are qualified are needed.\n\nWhat is known: Though men and women are nearly equally represented in MD-only and PhD-only programs, women are underrepresented in MD-PhD programs, which train physician-scientists. Prior studies have shown gender is not associated with rates of attrition from MD-PhD programs or differences in academic preparation, research interest, or research experience, suggesting enrollment differences by gender may be due to fewer women applying to MD-PhD programs. Gender parity in the\nphysician-scientist workforce is critical to equitably serving a diverse patient population.\n\nWhat this study adds: This study is the first to examine the role of gender disparities in the career choices of undergraduate women. Given the moderate familiarity with MD-PhD training and lack of research experience among respondents, increased awareness of MD-PhD programs and expanded research opportunities may help undergraduates make informed career choices. This may increase women MD-PhD applicants, creating a more balanced physician-scientist workforce to address the needs of patients from all backgrounds.\n\nKeywords: Education, Graduate, Sexism, Career Choice, Biomedical Research/education, Female","PeriodicalId":92771,"journal":{"name":"Cooper Rowan medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cooper Rowan medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31986/ISSN.2578-3343_VOL1ISS1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Despite equal enrollment proportions in MD and PhD programs, there are fewer women than men in MD-PhD programs and academic medicine. Factors important in degree program selection, including the perception of gender disparities, among undergraduate students were characterized. Methods: In 2017, women pre-health students at four public North Carolina universities were invited to participate in an online survey regarding career plans, decision factors, and perceptions of gender disparities in MD, PhD and MD-PhD pathways. This study characterizes factors important to program selection, and evaluates the association of intended graduate program with perceived gender disparities using Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Among the n=186 female survey participants, most were white (54 %) and intended MD, PhD, and/or MD-PhD programs (52 %). Sixty percent had heard of MD-PhD programs, over half had no research experience, and half were considering but uncertain about pursuing a research career. The most common factors influencing degree program choice were perceived competitiveness as an applicant, desired future work environment, and desire for patient interaction. Twenty-five percent of students considering MD, PhD, and MD-PhD programs stated that perceived gender disparities during training for those degrees will influence their choice of program, however intended degree was not statistically associated with perceived gender disparities. Discussion: Perceived gender disparities may influence choice of graduate training program but are not among the top factors. Perceived competitiveness as an applicant is an important career consideration among undergraduate women. Strategies to increase awareness of MD-PhD programs, to encourage women to consider all training paths for which they are qualified are needed. What is known: Though men and women are nearly equally represented in MD-only and PhD-only programs, women are underrepresented in MD-PhD programs, which train physician-scientists. Prior studies have shown gender is not associated with rates of attrition from MD-PhD programs or differences in academic preparation, research interest, or research experience, suggesting enrollment differences by gender may be due to fewer women applying to MD-PhD programs. Gender parity in the physician-scientist workforce is critical to equitably serving a diverse patient population. What this study adds: This study is the first to examine the role of gender disparities in the career choices of undergraduate women. Given the moderate familiarity with MD-PhD training and lack of research experience among respondents, increased awareness of MD-PhD programs and expanded research opportunities may help undergraduates make informed career choices. This may increase women MD-PhD applicants, creating a more balanced physician-scientist workforce to address the needs of patients from all backgrounds. Keywords: Education, Graduate, Sexism, Career Choice, Biomedical Research/education, Female
影响大学女生研究生课程选择的因素
背景:尽管医学博士和博士项目的入学比例相等,但在医学博士和学术医学项目中,女性人数少于男性。研究了本科生对学位项目选择的重要因素,包括对性别差异的感知。方法:2017年,北卡罗来纳州四所公立大学的女性健康前学生被邀请参加一项在线调查,内容涉及职业计划、决策因素以及对医学博士、博士和医学博士-博士路径中性别差异的看法。这项研究描述了对项目选择重要的因素,并使用Fisher精确测试评估了预期研究生项目与感知性别差异的关系。结果:在186名女性调查参与者中,大多数是白人(54%)和有意攻读医学博士、博士和/或医学博士学位的人(52%)。60%的人听说过医学博士项目,超过一半的人没有研究经验,一半的人正在考虑但不确定是否要从事研究事业。影响学位课程选择的最常见因素是申请人的竞争力、期望的未来工作环境以及与患者互动的愿望。25%考虑攻读医学博士、博士和医学博士课程的学生表示,在这些学位的培训过程中,感知到的性别差异会影响他们对课程的选择,但预期学位在统计上与感知到的两性差异无关。讨论:感知到的性别差异可能会影响研究生培训项目的选择,但不是首要因素。在本科女性中,求职者的竞争力是一个重要的职业考虑因素。需要制定战略,提高对医学博士和博士项目的认识,鼓励妇女考虑她们有资格参加的所有培训途径。已知情况:尽管男性和女性在仅医学博士和仅博士项目中的代表性几乎相等,但女性在培养医生科学家的医学博士项目中代表性不足。先前的研究表明,性别与医学博士学位项目的流失率或学术准备、研究兴趣或研究经验的差异无关,这表明性别入学差异可能是由于申请医学博士学位的女性较少。物理科学家队伍中的性别平等对于公平地为不同的患者群体服务至关重要。这项研究补充道:这项研究首次考察了性别差异在大学生女性职业选择中的作用。考虑到受访者对医学博士培训的适度熟悉和缺乏研究经验,提高对医学博士课程的认识和扩大研究机会可能有助于本科生做出明智的职业选择。这可能会增加女性医学博士申请者,创造一支更加平衡的医生和科学家队伍,以满足各种背景患者的需求。关键词:教育、研究生、性别歧视、职业选择、生物医学研究/教育、女性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信