Social (in)justices during the educator developmental appraisal process: A post-apartheid South African case study

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Venie Perumalsamy, J. Perumal, P. Naidoo, Naiema Taliep
{"title":"Social (in)justices during the educator developmental appraisal process: A post-apartheid South African case study","authors":"Venie Perumalsamy, J. Perumal, P. Naidoo, Naiema Taliep","doi":"10.1177/17461979231175074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, the appraisal of educators remains a contested issue as the process, which aims to provide support and development to educators, is generally considered a punitive measure for educators. Within the South African context, the Integrated Quality Management System is used to evaluate educators. Drawing on Fraser’s theories of social justice, this article explores the perspectives of 11 educators regarding educator developmental appraisal in post-apartheid South Africa as a catalyst for social (in)justice. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using critical discourse analysis. This article highlights the importance of social justice practices in enhancing learner achievement and foregrounds the (in)justices often witnessed during the appraisal process. Findings reveal that the developmental appraisal process has the potential to promote social justice; however, contextual factors seem to be hindering the successful implementation of the appraisal process.","PeriodicalId":45472,"journal":{"name":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979231175074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, the appraisal of educators remains a contested issue as the process, which aims to provide support and development to educators, is generally considered a punitive measure for educators. Within the South African context, the Integrated Quality Management System is used to evaluate educators. Drawing on Fraser’s theories of social justice, this article explores the perspectives of 11 educators regarding educator developmental appraisal in post-apartheid South Africa as a catalyst for social (in)justice. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using critical discourse analysis. This article highlights the importance of social justice practices in enhancing learner achievement and foregrounds the (in)justices often witnessed during the appraisal process. Findings reveal that the developmental appraisal process has the potential to promote social justice; however, contextual factors seem to be hindering the successful implementation of the appraisal process.
教育工作者发展评估过程中的社会公正:后种族隔离时期的南非个案研究
在全球范围内,对教育工作者的评估仍然是一个有争议的问题,因为旨在为教育工作者提供支持和发展的过程通常被认为是对教育工作者的惩罚措施。在南非的背景下,综合质量管理体系被用来评估教育工作者。根据弗雷泽的社会公正理论,本文探讨了11位教育家关于后种族隔离时期南非教育工作者发展评价作为社会公正催化剂的观点。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用批评话语分析进行分析。本文强调了社会公正实践在提高学习者成就方面的重要性,并介绍了在评估过程中经常看到的(非)公正。研究结果表明,发展性评价过程具有促进社会公正的潜力;然而,环境因素似乎阻碍了评价过程的成功实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Citizenship and Social Justice
Education Citizenship and Social Justice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信