Governmental Logics in Commercialised Planning Practices. The Case of Local Authority Pre-Application Negotiations in the English Planning System

IF 3.4 2区经济学 Q1 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Planning Theory & Practice Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1080/14649357.2021.2011388

G. Parker, M. Dobson, T. Lynn

引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper provides an empirical review of a widely used tool in the English planning system – pre-application discussions (‘pre-apps’) and a theoretical exposition of governmental ‘logics’ that underpin neoliberal-informed planning reforms. We present five logic frames of growth, efficiency, commercialisation, participation and quality, and apply these to pre-application negotiation practice, to highlight how Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) are faced with the challenge of reconciling a complex of multiple and often competing aims that appear irreconcilable in practice. We highlight that whilst ‘ordinary’ planning tools such as pre-apps may appear mundane, they can provide valuable instantiations where logics collide.

查看原文本刊更多论文

商业化规划实践中的政府逻辑。英国规划系统中地方当局申请前谈判案例

摘要本文对英国规划系统中广泛使用的工具——申请前讨论（“申请前讨论”）进行了实证回顾，并对支撑新自由主义知情规划改革的政府“逻辑”进行了理论阐述。我们提出了增长、效率、商业化、参与和质量的五个逻辑框架，并将其应用于申请前谈判实践，以强调地方规划当局（LPA）如何面临调和多重且往往相互竞争的目标的挑战，这些目标在实践中似乎不可调和。我们强调，虽然预应用程序等“普通”规划工具可能看起来很普通，但它们可以在逻辑冲突的地方提供有价值的实例化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Planning Theory & Practice Multiple-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

5.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Planning Theory & Practice provides an international focus for the development of theory and practice in spatial planning and a forum to promote the policy dimensions of space and place. Published four times a year in conjunction with the Royal Town Planning Institute, London, it publishes original articles and review papers from both academics and practitioners with the aim of encouraging more effective, two-way communication between theory and practice. The Editors invite robustly researched papers which raise issues at the leading edge of planning theory and practice, and welcome papers on controversial subjects. Contributors in the early stages of their academic careers are encouraged, as are rejoinders to items previously published.