Australian women educators’ internal exile and banishment in a centralised patriarchal state school system

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kay Whitehead
{"title":"Australian women educators’ internal exile and banishment in a centralised patriarchal state school system","authors":"Kay Whitehead","doi":"10.5944/hme.17.2023.33121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores Australian women teachers’ struggles for equality with men from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century. While Australia purported to be a progressive democratic nation, centralised patriarchal state school systems relied on women teachers to fulfil the requirements of free, compulsory and secular schooling. This study focuses on the state of South Australia where women were enfranchised in 1894, far ahead of European countries. However, women teachers were subjected to internal exile in the state school system, and banished by the marriage bar. The article begins with the construction of the South Australian state school system in the late nineteenth century. The enforcement of the marriage bar created a differentiated profession of many young single women who taught prior to marriage; a few married women who required an income; and a cohort of senior single women who made teaching a life-long career and contested other forms of subordination to which all women teachers were subject. Led by the latter group, South Australian women teachers pursued equality in early twentieth century mixed teachers unions and post-suffrage women’s organisations; and established the Women Teachers Guild in 1937 to secure more equal conditions of employment. The paper concludes with the situation after World War Two when married women were re admitted to the state school system to resolve teacher shortages; and campaigns for equal pay gathered momentum. In South Australia, the marriage bar was eventually removed in 1972.","PeriodicalId":42079,"journal":{"name":"Historia y Memoria de la Educacion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia y Memoria de la Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/hme.17.2023.33121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores Australian women teachers’ struggles for equality with men from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century. While Australia purported to be a progressive democratic nation, centralised patriarchal state school systems relied on women teachers to fulfil the requirements of free, compulsory and secular schooling. This study focuses on the state of South Australia where women were enfranchised in 1894, far ahead of European countries. However, women teachers were subjected to internal exile in the state school system, and banished by the marriage bar. The article begins with the construction of the South Australian state school system in the late nineteenth century. The enforcement of the marriage bar created a differentiated profession of many young single women who taught prior to marriage; a few married women who required an income; and a cohort of senior single women who made teaching a life-long career and contested other forms of subordination to which all women teachers were subject. Led by the latter group, South Australian women teachers pursued equality in early twentieth century mixed teachers unions and post-suffrage women’s organisations; and established the Women Teachers Guild in 1937 to secure more equal conditions of employment. The paper concludes with the situation after World War Two when married women were re admitted to the state school system to resolve teacher shortages; and campaigns for equal pay gathered momentum. In South Australia, the marriage bar was eventually removed in 1972.
澳大利亚女性教育工作者在中央集权的男权公立学校体系中的内部流亡和放逐
本文探讨了19世纪末至20世纪中叶澳大利亚女教师为争取男女平等而进行的斗争。虽然澳大利亚自称是一个进步的民主国家,但中央集权的父权制公立学校系统依靠女教师来满足免费、义务和世俗教育的要求。这项研究的重点是1894年女性被授予选举权的南澳大利亚州,远远领先于欧洲国家。然而,女教师在国家学校系统中遭到内部流放,并被禁止结婚。本文从19世纪末南澳大利亚州公立学校体系的构建开始。婚姻禁令的实施为许多年轻单身女性创造了一个有区别的职业,她们在婚前教书;少数需要收入的已婚妇女;以及一群资深单身女性,她们将教学作为终身职业,并对所有女教师都要服从的其他形式的从属关系提出质疑。在后一个群体的领导下,南澳大利亚女教师在20世纪初的混合教师工会和选举后妇女组织中追求平等;并于1937年成立了女教师协会,以确保更平等的就业条件。文章以第二次世界大战后的情况作为结论,当时已婚妇女被重新纳入公立学校系统,以解决教师短缺问题;同工同酬运动势头日益增强。在南澳大利亚州,结婚禁令最终于1972年取消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Historia y Memoria de la Educacion
Historia y Memoria de la Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信