Public Planner – A Deliberative Authority

IF 3.4 2区经济学 Q1 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Planning Theory & Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/14649357.2023.2177713

R. Mäntysalo, M. Westin, H. Mattila

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Beyond merely mediating between particular interests, deliberative planners are in need of a firmer agency in shaping attention to common good concerns. However, locating such agency legitimately in the context of deliberative ideals is difficult, and not well supported by theory. A key problem is the weak conceptualization of legitimate forms of power-over, regarding the deliberative planners’ agency. To address this theoretical challenge, the article employs Haugaard’s rethinking of power-over, Salet’s dialectics of public norms and performative aspirations, the “systems” turn of deliberative democracy theory, and Warren’s related work on authority.

查看原文本刊更多论文

公共规划师-一个审议的权威

摘要除了在特定利益之间进行调解之外，商议规划者还需要一个更坚定的机构来塑造对共同利益关注的关注。然而，在协商理想的背景下合法地定位这样的机构是困难的，而且没有很好的理论支持。一个关键问题是，关于议事规划者的代理，对合法的权力形式的概念化很弱。为了应对这一理论挑战，本文运用了豪加德对权力的重新思考、萨莱对公共规范和表现愿望的辩证法、协商民主理论的“制度”转向以及沃伦关于权力的相关工作。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Planning Theory & Practice Multiple-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

5.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Planning Theory & Practice provides an international focus for the development of theory and practice in spatial planning and a forum to promote the policy dimensions of space and place. Published four times a year in conjunction with the Royal Town Planning Institute, London, it publishes original articles and review papers from both academics and practitioners with the aim of encouraging more effective, two-way communication between theory and practice. The Editors invite robustly researched papers which raise issues at the leading edge of planning theory and practice, and welcome papers on controversial subjects. Contributors in the early stages of their academic careers are encouraged, as are rejoinders to items previously published.