30 Years of Gender Inequality and Implications on Curriculum Design in Open and Distance Learning

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Suzan Koseoglu, T. Ozturk, Hasan Ucar, E. Karahan, Aras Bozkurt
{"title":"30 Years of Gender Inequality and Implications on Curriculum Design in Open and Distance Learning","authors":"Suzan Koseoglu, T. Ozturk, Hasan Ucar, E. Karahan, Aras Bozkurt","doi":"10.5334/jime.553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender inequality is a pressing issue on a global scale, yet studies on this important issue have stayed on the margins of open and distance learning (ODL) literature. In this study, we critically analyse a batch of ODL literature that is focused on gender inequality in post-secondary and higher education contexts. We use Therborn’s social justice framework to inform and guide the study. This is a comprehensive social justice lens that sees inequality as “a life and death issue,” approaching empowerment as a central area of concern. Qualitative content analysis of 30 years of peer-reviewed literature reveals patriarchy and androcentrism as significant mechanisms that continue to produce gender inequality, in particular in women’s access to educational resources and formal learning opportunities. We highlight three themes that emerged in the content analysis: (1) ODL and equal opportunity; (2) Feminism and gender-sensitive curriculum design; and (3) Culturally relevant curriculum design. We critique views of access to technology-enabled education as an instrument for social justice, and provide a pedagogical model for an ODL curriculum centred on empowerment and agency, two concepts closely linked to existential inequality. We argue that such a curriculum is public service and requires a model of education that is based on participation and co-construction, and lies at the intersection of critical, feminist, and culturally relevant pedagogical practices.","PeriodicalId":45406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","volume":"2020 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Gender inequality is a pressing issue on a global scale, yet studies on this important issue have stayed on the margins of open and distance learning (ODL) literature. In this study, we critically analyse a batch of ODL literature that is focused on gender inequality in post-secondary and higher education contexts. We use Therborn’s social justice framework to inform and guide the study. This is a comprehensive social justice lens that sees inequality as “a life and death issue,” approaching empowerment as a central area of concern. Qualitative content analysis of 30 years of peer-reviewed literature reveals patriarchy and androcentrism as significant mechanisms that continue to produce gender inequality, in particular in women’s access to educational resources and formal learning opportunities. We highlight three themes that emerged in the content analysis: (1) ODL and equal opportunity; (2) Feminism and gender-sensitive curriculum design; and (3) Culturally relevant curriculum design. We critique views of access to technology-enabled education as an instrument for social justice, and provide a pedagogical model for an ODL curriculum centred on empowerment and agency, two concepts closely linked to existential inequality. We argue that such a curriculum is public service and requires a model of education that is based on participation and co-construction, and lies at the intersection of critical, feminist, and culturally relevant pedagogical practices.
30年的性别不平等及其对开放和远程教育课程设计的影响
性别不平等是全球范围内的一个紧迫问题,但对这一重要问题的研究一直停留在开放和远程学习(ODL)文献的边缘。在这项研究中,我们批判性地分析了一批ODL文献,这些文献侧重于中学后和高等教育背景下的性别不平等。我们使用Therborn的社会正义框架来为研究提供信息和指导。这是一个全面的社会正义视角,将不平等视为“生死攸关的问题”,将赋权视为关注的核心领域。对30年同行评审文献的定性内容分析表明,父权制和男性中心主义是继续产生性别不平等的重要机制,特别是在妇女获得教育资源和正式学习机会方面。我们强调了内容分析中出现的三个主题:(1)ODL和机会平等;(2) 女权主义和对性别问题敏感的课程设计;(3)与文化相关的课程设计。我们批评了将获得技术支持的教育视为社会正义的工具的观点,并为以赋权和代理为中心的ODL课程提供了一个教学模式,这两个概念与存在的不平等密切相关。我们认为,这样的课程是公共服务,需要一种基于参与和共建的教育模式,并处于批判性、女权主义和文化相关教学实践的交叉点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Journal of Interactive Media in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信