Linking empowering leadership with workplace proactivity: the mediating role of psychological safety and knowledge sharing

IF 1.6 Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Ashutosh Kumar Singh
{"title":"Linking empowering leadership with workplace proactivity: the mediating role of psychological safety and knowledge sharing","authors":"Ashutosh Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1108/ebhrm-07-2021-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to explore the association between empowering leadership and workplace proactivity.Design/methodology/approachThe data have been collected through questionnaires from both the medical and non-medical staff members working in four National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare (NABH)–accredited private hospitals in India. Confirmatory factor analysis has employed test reliability and validity and PROCESS MACRO (model 6) to test the proposed serial mediation model.FindingsThe results support the proposed hypotheses of the serial mediation model. Additionally, the authors have also found that psychological safety is a strong mediating variable than knowledge sharing between empowering leadership and workplace proactivity.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings should be interpreted by considering the cross-sectional research design and self-reported measures.Practical implicationsAn organization can use the findings to promote employee proactivity at the workplace.Originality/valueThe study makes an attempt to explore the underdeveloped relationship between empowering leadership and workplace proactivity in the context of Indian NABH-accredited hospitals based on the self-determination theory.","PeriodicalId":51902,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-07-2021-0140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to explore the association between empowering leadership and workplace proactivity.Design/methodology/approachThe data have been collected through questionnaires from both the medical and non-medical staff members working in four National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare (NABH)–accredited private hospitals in India. Confirmatory factor analysis has employed test reliability and validity and PROCESS MACRO (model 6) to test the proposed serial mediation model.FindingsThe results support the proposed hypotheses of the serial mediation model. Additionally, the authors have also found that psychological safety is a strong mediating variable than knowledge sharing between empowering leadership and workplace proactivity.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings should be interpreted by considering the cross-sectional research design and self-reported measures.Practical implicationsAn organization can use the findings to promote employee proactivity at the workplace.Originality/valueThe study makes an attempt to explore the underdeveloped relationship between empowering leadership and workplace proactivity in the context of Indian NABH-accredited hospitals based on the self-determination theory.
将赋权领导与工作场所主动性联系起来:心理安全和知识共享的中介作用
目的本研究旨在探讨授权领导与工作积极性之间的关系。设计/方法/方法数据是通过问卷调查从四家印度国家医院和医疗保健认证委员会(NABH)认证的私立医院的医疗和非医疗工作人员那里收集的。验证性因素分析采用测试信度和有效性以及PROCESS MACRO(模型6)来测试所提出的串行中介模型。结果支持了串行中介模型的假设。此外,作者还发现,在授权领导和工作场所积极性之间,心理安全是一个强大的中介变量,而不是知识共享。研究局限性/含义应通过考虑横断面研究设计和自我报告的措施来解释研究结果。实际含义组织可以利用这些发现来促进员工在工作场所的积极性。独创性/价值本研究试图基于自决理论,在印度国家医疗服务体系认证的医院背景下,探讨授权领导与工作场所主动性之间不发达的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信