The relationship between R&D subsidy and R&D cooperation in eco-innovative companies. An analysis taking a complementarity approach

IF 7.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Manuel Guisado-González , María del Mar Rodríguez-Domínguez , Mercedes Vila-Alonso , Encarnación González-Vázquez
{"title":"The relationship between R&D subsidy and R&D cooperation in eco-innovative companies. An analysis taking a complementarity approach","authors":"Manuel Guisado-González ,&nbsp;María del Mar Rodríguez-Domínguez ,&nbsp;Mercedes Vila-Alonso ,&nbsp;Encarnación González-Vázquez","doi":"10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyze whether eco-innovation has a positive or negative influence on the business performance of companies and, through the complementarity approach, whether the joint implementation of R&amp;D subsidy and R&amp;D cooperation increases or decreases the sum of their respective individual impacts on the business performance. If the joint implementation is substitutive, business performance will be lower than potentially possible, so granting R&amp;D subsidies under the condition of establishing R&amp;D cooperation would not be an adequate policy to promote eco-innovation. The analyses were performed using data from the Technological Innovation Panel (PITEC) of 2013 for Spanish manufacturing companies. Our findings indicate that an eco-innovation-oriented strategy positively affects the labor productivity of companies and that receiving public aid as a consequence of establishing R&amp;D cooperation agreements has a lower effect on labor productivity (non-eco-innovative companies), or the same effect (eco-innovative companies), compared to the sum of the individual impacts of R&amp;D cooperation and R&amp;D subsidy. Consequently, in non-eco-innovative companies the use of subsidized R&amp;D cooperation is inadvisable, while their use in eco-innovative companies is neutral.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45796,"journal":{"name":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000292/pdfft?md5=c659f1349345b79fb589a83ccddd3dd9&pid=1-s2.0-S2444883421000292-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We analyze whether eco-innovation has a positive or negative influence on the business performance of companies and, through the complementarity approach, whether the joint implementation of R&D subsidy and R&D cooperation increases or decreases the sum of their respective individual impacts on the business performance. If the joint implementation is substitutive, business performance will be lower than potentially possible, so granting R&D subsidies under the condition of establishing R&D cooperation would not be an adequate policy to promote eco-innovation. The analyses were performed using data from the Technological Innovation Panel (PITEC) of 2013 for Spanish manufacturing companies. Our findings indicate that an eco-innovation-oriented strategy positively affects the labor productivity of companies and that receiving public aid as a consequence of establishing R&D cooperation agreements has a lower effect on labor productivity (non-eco-innovative companies), or the same effect (eco-innovative companies), compared to the sum of the individual impacts of R&D cooperation and R&D subsidy. Consequently, in non-eco-innovative companies the use of subsidized R&D cooperation is inadvisable, while their use in eco-innovative companies is neutral.

生态创新企业研发补贴与研发合作的关系。采用互补方法的分析
我们分析了生态创新对企业经营绩效的影响是积极的还是消极的,并通过互补的方法分析了研发补贴和研发合作的联合实施对企业经营绩效的影响是增加还是减少了各自个体影响的总和。如果联合实施是替代的,企业绩效将低于潜在的可能,因此在建立研发合作的情况下给予研发补贴并不是促进生态创新的适当政策。分析使用了2013年西班牙制造公司的技术创新小组(PITEC)的数据。我们的研究结果表明,与研发合作和研发补贴的个体影响之和相比,生态创新战略对企业的劳动生产率产生了积极的影响,而建立研发合作协议后接受公共援助对劳动生产率的影响(非生态创新企业)较低,对生态创新企业的影响相同。因此,在非生态创新公司中,补贴研发合作是不可取的,而在生态创新公司中,补贴研发合作是中性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
30
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE) was born in 1995 as Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE). The journal is published by the European Academy of Management and Business Economics (AEDEM) under this new title since 2016, it was indexed in SCOPUS in 2012 and in Thomson Reuters Emerging Sources Citation Index in 2015. From the beginning, the aim of the Journal is to foster academic research by publishing original research articles that meet the highest analytical standards, and provide new insights that contribute and spread the business management knowledge
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信