Effects of language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality in prosodic boundary identification

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
C. Kuo
{"title":"Effects of language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality\n in prosodic boundary identification","authors":"C. Kuo","doi":"10.1075/consl.22029.kuo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the effects of several stimulus sources:\n language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality, on listeners’\n predictions of the sizes of the upcoming prosodic boundaries. Experiments with\n native Taiwanese speakers were conducted, and the stimuli varied in prosodic\n boundary units (i.e., word, phrase, and sentence), languages (i.e., Taiwanese,\n English, and Swedish), utterance lengths (i.e., 2-second, and 2 syllables; the\n latter is approximately 0.416-second long), and speech qualities (i.e., normal\n speech, low-pass filtered speech). Results showed that: (a) listeners performed\n better when the utterances were longer; (b) listeners performed better in\n low-pass filtered speech when they had no prior knowledge of the target\n language; (c) there was a tendency for the language familiarity effect, but this\n effect was heavily influenced by the extent of similarity of the phonetic\n realizations in different prosodic boundaries, and the listeners’ language\n proficiency which was associated with working memory storage capacity.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.22029.kuo","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of several stimulus sources: language familiarity, utterance length, and speech quality, on listeners’ predictions of the sizes of the upcoming prosodic boundaries. Experiments with native Taiwanese speakers were conducted, and the stimuli varied in prosodic boundary units (i.e., word, phrase, and sentence), languages (i.e., Taiwanese, English, and Swedish), utterance lengths (i.e., 2-second, and 2 syllables; the latter is approximately 0.416-second long), and speech qualities (i.e., normal speech, low-pass filtered speech). Results showed that: (a) listeners performed better when the utterances were longer; (b) listeners performed better in low-pass filtered speech when they had no prior knowledge of the target language; (c) there was a tendency for the language familiarity effect, but this effect was heavily influenced by the extent of similarity of the phonetic realizations in different prosodic boundaries, and the listeners’ language proficiency which was associated with working memory storage capacity.
语言熟悉度、话语长度和语音质量对韵律边界识别的影响
本研究调查了几种刺激来源:语言熟悉度、话语长度和语音质量对听众预测即将到来的韵律边界大小的影响。以台语为母语的人进行实验,刺激在韵律边界单位(即单词、短语和句子)、语言(即台语、英语和瑞典语)、话语长度(即2秒和2个音节;后者约0.416秒长)和语音质量(即正常语音、低通滤波语音)方面各不相同。结果表明:(a)当话语长度较长时,听众表现较好;(b) 当听众事先不了解目标语言时,他们在低通滤波语音中表现更好;(c) 存在着语言熟悉效应的趋势,但这种效应在很大程度上受到不同韵律边界下语音实现的相似程度的影响,以及听众的语言熟练程度与工作记忆存储能力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信