Participatory Action Planning to Address the Opioid Crisis in a Rural Virginia Community Using the SEED Method

E. Zimmerman, C. Rafie, Dawn E Moser, Angelina J Hargrove, Toni Noe, Courtnaye Adams Mills
{"title":"Participatory Action Planning to Address the Opioid Crisis in a Rural Virginia Community Using the SEED Method","authors":"E. Zimmerman, C. Rafie, Dawn E Moser, Angelina J Hargrove, Toni Noe, Courtnaye Adams Mills","doi":"10.35844/001c.13182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SEED Method is a multi-stakeholder approach that was created to involve diverse stakeholders in the development and prioritization of research questions using community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles. Here we describe an adaptation of the SEED Method that focuses on developing and prioritizing strategies for addressing a health problem and bringing stakeholders together to develop and implement community action plans based on those strategies. We describe steps for implementing the SEED Method for community action planning and the results of a case study in a rural Virginia community with high opioid prescription and mortality rates. A participatory research team worked with three groups of Topic stakeholders to gather data, develop conceptual models, and create and prioritize strategies for reducing prescription and non-prescription opioid misuse and overdoses. Each group came up with 19 to 25 strategies and prioritized their top five, which included actions, services or programs, strategies, policies, and system changes. Attendees at community action planning meetings reviewed the 15 prioritized strategies, proposed three additional strategies, and prioritized their top choices. Community stakeholders started four work groups to implement the selected strategies in collaboration with the research team.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The SEED Method is a multi-stakeholder approach that was created to involve diverse stakeholders in the development and prioritization of research questions using community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles. Here we describe an adaptation of the SEED Method that focuses on developing and prioritizing strategies for addressing a health problem and bringing stakeholders together to develop and implement community action plans based on those strategies. We describe steps for implementing the SEED Method for community action planning and the results of a case study in a rural Virginia community with high opioid prescription and mortality rates. A participatory research team worked with three groups of Topic stakeholders to gather data, develop conceptual models, and create and prioritize strategies for reducing prescription and non-prescription opioid misuse and overdoses. Each group came up with 19 to 25 strategies and prioritized their top five, which included actions, services or programs, strategies, policies, and system changes. Attendees at community action planning meetings reviewed the 15 prioritized strategies, proposed three additional strategies, and prioritized their top choices. Community stakeholders started four work groups to implement the selected strategies in collaboration with the research team.
使用SEED方法解决弗吉尼亚州农村社区阿片类药物危机的参与性行动计划
SEED方法是一种多方利益相关者方法,旨在利用基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)原则,让不同的利益相关者参与研究问题的制定和优先排序。在这里,我们描述了SEED方法的调整,该方法侧重于制定和优先考虑解决健康问题的战略,并将利益相关者聚集在一起,根据这些战略制定和实施社区行动计划。我们描述了实施SEED方法进行社区行动规划的步骤,以及弗吉尼亚州一个阿片类药物处方率和死亡率较高的农村社区的案例研究结果。一个参与性研究团队与三组主题利益相关者合作,收集数据,开发概念模型,制定减少处方和非处方阿片类药物滥用和过量的战略并确定其优先顺序。每组提出19到25个战略,并将前五个战略列为优先事项,其中包括行动、服务或计划、战略、政策和系统变革。社区行动规划会议的与会者审查了15项优先战略,提出了三项额外战略,并确定了他们的首要选择。社区利益相关者成立了四个工作组,与研究团队合作实施选定的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信