Marriage choices, social homogamy and modernization in Milan, 1890-1899 and 1950-1959

IF 1 3区 历史学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Giulia Corti, Maurizio Pisati
{"title":"Marriage choices, social homogamy and modernization in Milan, 1890-1899 and 1950-1959","authors":"Giulia Corti, Maurizio Pisati","doi":"10.1080/1081602X.2021.1888767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Marriage patterns are a key element in the social reproduction of inequalities because, through marriage, socio-economic resources are distributed among individuals and households. Furthermore, the measure by which individuals from different groups marry each other can be considered as an indicator of the grade of openness of a society. From a historical perspective, modernization theory has traditionally predicted a decrease in marital homogamy by social origin. Long-term trends in social homogamy have been investigated in the social history field, and empirical evidence is quite diverse across contexts and periods. We analyzed patterns of social homogamy in Milan using new couple-level data on marriages between the end of the 19th and the first half of the 20th century. Following the modernization framework, we hypothesized that the transition towards an industrial society should be accompanied by an increase in social heterogamy. Results show that, net of changing marginal distributions across social classes, patterns of couple formation remain substantively the same across time. Men appear less mobile than women, who have a higher tendency towards upward marital mobility. As for intermarriage among social classes, boundaries between the top and bottom classes, and barriers between manual and non-manual workers remained strong across time. These results, as previously found in other contexts, do not fully corroborate the modernization theory.","PeriodicalId":46118,"journal":{"name":"History of the Family","volume":"26 1","pages":"353 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1081602X.2021.1888767","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2021.1888767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Marriage patterns are a key element in the social reproduction of inequalities because, through marriage, socio-economic resources are distributed among individuals and households. Furthermore, the measure by which individuals from different groups marry each other can be considered as an indicator of the grade of openness of a society. From a historical perspective, modernization theory has traditionally predicted a decrease in marital homogamy by social origin. Long-term trends in social homogamy have been investigated in the social history field, and empirical evidence is quite diverse across contexts and periods. We analyzed patterns of social homogamy in Milan using new couple-level data on marriages between the end of the 19th and the first half of the 20th century. Following the modernization framework, we hypothesized that the transition towards an industrial society should be accompanied by an increase in social heterogamy. Results show that, net of changing marginal distributions across social classes, patterns of couple formation remain substantively the same across time. Men appear less mobile than women, who have a higher tendency towards upward marital mobility. As for intermarriage among social classes, boundaries between the top and bottom classes, and barriers between manual and non-manual workers remained strong across time. These results, as previously found in other contexts, do not fully corroborate the modernization theory.
1890-1899年和1950-1959年米兰的婚姻选择、社会同性恋与现代化
婚姻模式是不平等社会再生产的一个关键因素,因为通过婚姻,社会经济资源在个人和家庭之间分配。此外,来自不同群体的个人结婚的衡量标准可以被视为一个社会开放程度的指标。从历史的角度来看,现代化理论传统上预测婚姻同婚现象会因社会原因而减少。社会史领域已经对社会同性恋的长期趋势进行了研究,不同背景和时期的经验证据也相当多样。我们使用19世纪末至20世纪上半叶婚姻的新夫妇级数据分析了米兰的社会同性恋模式。根据现代化框架,我们假设向工业社会的过渡应该伴随着社会异质性的增加。结果表明,除去社会阶层之间不断变化的边际分布,夫妻形成的模式在不同时间内基本保持不变。男性的流动性似乎不如女性,女性的婚姻流动性更高。至于社会阶层之间的通婚,上层阶级和下层阶级之间的界限,以及体力劳动者和非体力劳动者之间的障碍,随着时间的推移仍然很强。这些结果,正如之前在其他背景下发现的那样,并不能完全证实现代化理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The History of the Family: An International Quarterly makes a significant contribution by publishing works reflecting new developments in scholarship and by charting new directions in the historical study of the family. Further emphasizing the international developments in historical research on the family, the Quarterly encourages articles on comparative research across various cultures and societies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim, in addition to Europe, the United States and Canada, as well as work in the context of global history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信