Respuesta a la intervención y escritura en niños de grupos sociales vulnerados

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Beatriz Diuk, Marina Ferroni, Milagros Mena, J. P. Barreyro
{"title":"Respuesta a la intervención y escritura en niños de grupos sociales vulnerados","authors":"Beatriz Diuk, Marina Ferroni, Milagros Mena, J. P. Barreyro","doi":"10.22235/PE.V10I2.1426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl objetivo del estudio fue analizar la respuesta a la intervencion (rai) en ninos en contextos de pobreza con bajo nivel de alfabetizacion respecto de sus pares. Durante seis meses, 37 alumnos de 7 a 14 anos de edad participaron de un programa de ensenanza individual. Los ninos completaron una prueba de escritura de palabras al comenzar y al finalizar la intervencion. Se obtuvieron diferencias significativas entre el pre y pos test. Un analisis de regresion sobre la ganancia en escritura mostro que la cantidad de sesiones del programa tuvo un efecto significativo. Solamente un 16 % de los ninos presento baja rai, lo que indica que las dificultades de la mayor parte de los ninos serian experienciales y no resultado de deficit cognitivo. EnglishThe paper aimed to analyze the Response to Intervention (rti) in children growing up in poverty contexts and exhibiting low levels of literacy when compared to their school peers. For six months, 37 7‑to‑14-year-old children (41 % girls) participated in an educational program administered individually. Children were given a word spelling task before and after the intervention. Statistically significant differences were obtained between pre‑ and post‑test. A regression analysis carried out on spelling gains showed that the number of program sessions children participated in had a significant effect. Only 16 % of the children had a low rti, indicating that most children´s difficulties were experiential rather that related to cognitive deficits.","PeriodicalId":41973,"journal":{"name":"Paginas de Educacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paginas de Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22235/PE.V10I2.1426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

espanolEl objetivo del estudio fue analizar la respuesta a la intervencion (rai) en ninos en contextos de pobreza con bajo nivel de alfabetizacion respecto de sus pares. Durante seis meses, 37 alumnos de 7 a 14 anos de edad participaron de un programa de ensenanza individual. Los ninos completaron una prueba de escritura de palabras al comenzar y al finalizar la intervencion. Se obtuvieron diferencias significativas entre el pre y pos test. Un analisis de regresion sobre la ganancia en escritura mostro que la cantidad de sesiones del programa tuvo un efecto significativo. Solamente un 16 % de los ninos presento baja rai, lo que indica que las dificultades de la mayor parte de los ninos serian experienciales y no resultado de deficit cognitivo. EnglishThe paper aimed to analyze the Response to Intervention (rti) in children growing up in poverty contexts and exhibiting low levels of literacy when compared to their school peers. For six months, 37 7‑to‑14-year-old children (41 % girls) participated in an educational program administered individually. Children were given a word spelling task before and after the intervention. Statistically significant differences were obtained between pre‑ and post‑test. A regression analysis carried out on spelling gains showed that the number of program sessions children participated in had a significant effect. Only 16 % of the children had a low rti, indicating that most children´s difficulties were experiential rather that related to cognitive deficits.
对弱势社会群体儿童干预与写作的回应
这项研究的目的是分析识字水平低的贫困儿童与同龄人相比对干预(rai)的反应。在六个月的时间里,37名7至14岁的学生参加了个人教学计划。孩子们在干预开始和结束时完成了单词写作测试。两项试验均采用随机对照试验(rct)和随机对照试验(rct)。对写作增益的回归分析表明,程序的会话次数有显著影响。只有16%的儿童表现出低rai,这表明大多数儿童的困难是经验的,而不是认知缺陷的结果。该论文旨在分析在贫困环境中长大的儿童与同龄人相比识字水平较低的干预反应(rti)。在6个月的时间里,37名7至14岁的儿童(41%是女孩)参加了一个单独管理的教育项目。孩子们在干预前后都要完成拼写任务。在测试前和测试后获得了统计学上的显著差异。对拼写收益进行的回归分析表明,儿童参加的方案会议数量有显著影响。只有16%的儿童的rti较低,这表明大多数儿童的困难是经验的,而不是认知缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paginas de Educacion
Paginas de Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信