Anesthesiology Residency Recruitment: A Prospective Study Comparing In-Person and Virtual Interviews.

Sarah L. Nizamuddin, Shiragi Patel, Junaid Nizamuddin, Usman Latif, Sang Mee Lee, A. Tung, Allison Dalton, J. Klafta, Michael O'Connor, S. Shahul
{"title":"Anesthesiology Residency Recruitment: A Prospective Study Comparing In-Person and Virtual Interviews.","authors":"Sarah L. Nizamuddin, Shiragi Patel, Junaid Nizamuddin, Usman Latif, Sang Mee Lee, A. Tung, Allison Dalton, J. Klafta, Michael O'Connor, S. Shahul","doi":"10.46374/volxxiv_issue1_nizamuddin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nResidency recruitment requires significant resources for both applicants and residency programs. Virtual interviews offer a way to reduce the time and costs required during the residency interview process. This prospective study investigated how virtual interviews affected scoring of anesthesiology residency applicants and whether this effect differed from in-person interview historical controls.\n\n\nMethods\nBetween November 2020 and January 2021, recruitment members at the University of Chicago scored applicants before their interview based upon written application materials alone (preinterview score). Applicants received a second score after their virtual interview (postinterview score). Recruitment members were queried regarding the most important factor affecting the preinterview score as well as the effect of certain specified applicant interview characteristics on the postinterview score. Previously published historical controls were used for comparison to in-person recruitment the year prior from the same institution.\n\n\nResults\nEight hundred and sixteen virtual interviews involving 272 applicants and 19 faculty members were conducted. The postinterview score was higher than the preinterview score (4.06 versus 3.98, P value of <.0001). The change in scores after virtual interviews did not differ from that after in-person interviews conducted the previous year (P = .378). The effect of each characteristic on score change due to the interview did not differ between in-person and virtual interviews (all P values >.05). The factor identified by faculty as the most important in the preinterview score was academic achievements (64%), and faculty identified the most important interview characteristic to be personality (72%).\n\n\nConclusions\nVirtual interviews led to a significant change in scoring of residency applicants, and the magnitude of this change was similar compared with in-person interviews. Further studies should elaborate on the effect of virtual recruitment on residency programs and applicants.","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"24 1 1","pages":"E681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiv_issue1_nizamuddin","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Residency recruitment requires significant resources for both applicants and residency programs. Virtual interviews offer a way to reduce the time and costs required during the residency interview process. This prospective study investigated how virtual interviews affected scoring of anesthesiology residency applicants and whether this effect differed from in-person interview historical controls. Methods Between November 2020 and January 2021, recruitment members at the University of Chicago scored applicants before their interview based upon written application materials alone (preinterview score). Applicants received a second score after their virtual interview (postinterview score). Recruitment members were queried regarding the most important factor affecting the preinterview score as well as the effect of certain specified applicant interview characteristics on the postinterview score. Previously published historical controls were used for comparison to in-person recruitment the year prior from the same institution. Results Eight hundred and sixteen virtual interviews involving 272 applicants and 19 faculty members were conducted. The postinterview score was higher than the preinterview score (4.06 versus 3.98, P value of <.0001). The change in scores after virtual interviews did not differ from that after in-person interviews conducted the previous year (P = .378). The effect of each characteristic on score change due to the interview did not differ between in-person and virtual interviews (all P values >.05). The factor identified by faculty as the most important in the preinterview score was academic achievements (64%), and faculty identified the most important interview characteristic to be personality (72%). Conclusions Virtual interviews led to a significant change in scoring of residency applicants, and the magnitude of this change was similar compared with in-person interviews. Further studies should elaborate on the effect of virtual recruitment on residency programs and applicants.
麻醉学住院医师招募:一项前瞻性研究,比较面对面和虚拟访谈。
背景实习招聘需要为申请人和实习项目提供大量资源。虚拟面试提供了一种减少实习面试过程所需时间和成本的方法。这项前瞻性研究调查了虚拟面试如何影响麻醉学住院申请人的评分,以及这种影响是否与面对面的面试历史对照不同。方法在2020年11月至2021年1月期间,芝加哥大学的招聘成员在面试前仅根据书面申请材料对申请人进行评分(面试前评分)。申请人在虚拟面试后获得第二分(互动后分数)。招聘成员被问及影响面试前分数的最重要因素,以及某些特定的申请人面试特征对面试后分数的影响。以前公布的历史对照用于与前一年从同一机构亲自招聘进行比较。结果共进行了816次虚拟面试,涉及272名申请人和19名教职员工。面试后的得分高于面试前的得分(4.06对3.98,P值0.05)。教师认为在面试前得分中最重要的因素是学习成绩(64%),教师认为最重要的面试特征是个性(72%),与面对面的采访相比,这种变化的幅度是相似的。进一步的研究应该详细说明虚拟招聘对实习项目和申请人的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信