Healthcare Resource Utilization among Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Switched from Warfarin to a Novel Oral Anti-Coagulant

J. Franchino-Elder, A. Gilligan, Xue Song, Bríain ó. Hartaigh, C. Henriques, A. Sainski‐Nguyen, Cheng Wang
{"title":"Healthcare Resource Utilization among Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Switched from Warfarin to a Novel Oral Anti-Coagulant","authors":"J. Franchino-Elder, A. Gilligan, Xue Song, Bríain ó. Hartaigh, C. Henriques, A. Sainski‐Nguyen, Cheng Wang","doi":"10.29245/2578-3025/2019/4.1177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), switching from warfarin to novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is common, yet clarifying the differences in the effect of NOACs on all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) are unknown. Adult NVAF patients who switched from warfarin to dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban were identified in MarketScan databases between 10/2010-12/2015. Patients had 12 months pre-period (index date was 1st NOAC claim) and were followed up to 12 months until medication discontinuation, end of enrollment, inpatient death, or 12/2016. Overall, 8,679 and 5,761 dabigatran switchers were matched (1:1) to rivaroxaban and apixaban switchers (mean age 73-74 years). Compared with rivaroxaban switchers, a lower proportion of dabigatran switchers had an inpatient (IP) visit (20.0% vs. 21.6%, p=0.008). Dabigatran switchers had lower per-patient-per-month (PPPM) total outpatient (3.87 vs. 4.06, p=0.002), emergency department (ED; 0.48 vs. 0.52, p=0.026), outpatient office (1.17 vs. 1.22, p<0.001), and other outpatient (2.71 vs. 2.83, p=0.043) visits compared with rivaroxaban switchers. A similar proportion of dabigatran and apixaban switchers had an IP visit (20.7% vs. 21.2%); compared with apixaban switchers, dabigatran switchers had significantly more PPPM IP visits (0.23 vs. 0.21, p=0.031) but significantly lower ED visits (0.47 vs. 0.52, p=0.016). Post-discharge 30-day readmission rates were comparable among warfarin-to-NOAC switching groups. Time to readmission was longer for dabigatran versus rivaroxaban switchers (8.2 vs. 7.8 days, p<0.001), but comparable with apixaban patients (8.1 vs. 8.4 days). Switching to dabigatran after warfarin discontinuation may lower HCRU among NVAF patients compared with switching to rivaroxaban or apixaban.","PeriodicalId":93019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology and cardiovascular sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology and cardiovascular sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29245/2578-3025/2019/4.1177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), switching from warfarin to novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is common, yet clarifying the differences in the effect of NOACs on all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) are unknown. Adult NVAF patients who switched from warfarin to dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban were identified in MarketScan databases between 10/2010-12/2015. Patients had 12 months pre-period (index date was 1st NOAC claim) and were followed up to 12 months until medication discontinuation, end of enrollment, inpatient death, or 12/2016. Overall, 8,679 and 5,761 dabigatran switchers were matched (1:1) to rivaroxaban and apixaban switchers (mean age 73-74 years). Compared with rivaroxaban switchers, a lower proportion of dabigatran switchers had an inpatient (IP) visit (20.0% vs. 21.6%, p=0.008). Dabigatran switchers had lower per-patient-per-month (PPPM) total outpatient (3.87 vs. 4.06, p=0.002), emergency department (ED; 0.48 vs. 0.52, p=0.026), outpatient office (1.17 vs. 1.22, p<0.001), and other outpatient (2.71 vs. 2.83, p=0.043) visits compared with rivaroxaban switchers. A similar proportion of dabigatran and apixaban switchers had an IP visit (20.7% vs. 21.2%); compared with apixaban switchers, dabigatran switchers had significantly more PPPM IP visits (0.23 vs. 0.21, p=0.031) but significantly lower ED visits (0.47 vs. 0.52, p=0.016). Post-discharge 30-day readmission rates were comparable among warfarin-to-NOAC switching groups. Time to readmission was longer for dabigatran versus rivaroxaban switchers (8.2 vs. 7.8 days, p<0.001), but comparable with apixaban patients (8.1 vs. 8.4 days). Switching to dabigatran after warfarin discontinuation may lower HCRU among NVAF patients compared with switching to rivaroxaban or apixaban.
从华法林转向新型口服抗凝剂的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的医疗资源利用
在非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中,从华法林转为新型口服抗凝剂(NOAC)很常见,但尚不清楚NOAC对全因医疗资源利用(HCRU)影响的差异。在2010年10月至2015年12月期间,MarketScan数据库中发现了从华法林转为达比加群、阿哌沙班或利伐沙班的成年NVAF患者。患者术前12个月(指标日期为首次NOAC索赔),随访12个月,直到停药、入组结束、住院死亡或2016年12月。总体而言,8679和5761个达比加群切换器与利伐沙班和阿哌沙班切换器匹配(1:1)(平均年龄73-74岁)。与利伐沙班换药者相比,达比加群换药者的住院(IP)就诊比例较低(20.0%对21.6%,p=0.008)。达比加特兰换药者每月每位患者的门诊总人数(3.87对4.06,p=0.002)、急诊科(ED;0.48对0.52,p=0.026)、门诊部(1.17对1.22,p<0.001),和其他门诊就诊(2.71对2.83,p=0.043)。类似比例的达比加群和阿哌沙班交换机有IP访问(20.7%对21.2%);与阿哌沙班换药组相比,达比加群换药组的PPPM IP访视次数显著增加(0.23 vs.0.21,p=0.031),ED访视次数明显减少(0.47 vs.0.52,p=0.016)。达比加群与利伐沙班转换者的再入院时间更长(8.2天vs.7.8天,p<0.001),但与阿哌沙班患者的再次入院时间相当(8.1天vs.8.4天)。与改用利伐沙班或阿哌沙班相比,停用华法林后改用达比加群可能会降低NVAF患者的HCRU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信