Comparison of Genetic Variation of Anthurium (Anthurium andraeanum) Cultivars Using SCoT, CDDP and RAPD Markers

A. Saidi, Z. Daneshvar, Z. Hajibarat
{"title":"Comparison of Genetic Variation of Anthurium (Anthurium andraeanum) Cultivars Using SCoT, CDDP and RAPD Markers","authors":"A. Saidi, Z. Daneshvar, Z. Hajibarat","doi":"10.3329/PTCB.V28I2.39676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the genetic diversity among 10 cultivars of anthurium were performed using three molecular markers such as Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) and Conserved DNA-derived Polymorphism (CDDP), and Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Polymorphism index content (PIC) was calculated 0.39, 0.42 and 0.37 for RAPD, SCoT and CDDP, respectively. This result showed all the three molecular markers had almost an identical potential in estimating genetic diversity. Cluster analysis using SCoT, CDDP and RAPD divided the cultivars to three distinct clusters. The similarity matrix obtained through SCoT and CDDP was positively significantly correlated (r = 0.76, p < 0.01). This is the first report in which the efficiency of two targeted DNA region molecular markers (SCoT and CDDP) together with RAPD technique have been compared with each other in a set of anthurium cultivras. Results suggested that SCOT, CDDP and RAPD fingerprinting techniques are of sufficient ability to detect polymorphism in anthurium cultivars. \nPlant Tissue Cult. & Biotech. 28(2): 171-182, 2018 (December)","PeriodicalId":91158,"journal":{"name":"Plant tissue culture & biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/PTCB.V28I2.39676","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant tissue culture & biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/PTCB.V28I2.39676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

To evaluate the genetic diversity among 10 cultivars of anthurium were performed using three molecular markers such as Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) and Conserved DNA-derived Polymorphism (CDDP), and Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Polymorphism index content (PIC) was calculated 0.39, 0.42 and 0.37 for RAPD, SCoT and CDDP, respectively. This result showed all the three molecular markers had almost an identical potential in estimating genetic diversity. Cluster analysis using SCoT, CDDP and RAPD divided the cultivars to three distinct clusters. The similarity matrix obtained through SCoT and CDDP was positively significantly correlated (r = 0.76, p < 0.01). This is the first report in which the efficiency of two targeted DNA region molecular markers (SCoT and CDDP) together with RAPD technique have been compared with each other in a set of anthurium cultivras. Results suggested that SCOT, CDDP and RAPD fingerprinting techniques are of sufficient ability to detect polymorphism in anthurium cultivars. Plant Tissue Cult. & Biotech. 28(2): 171-182, 2018 (December)
用SCoT、CDDP和RAPD标记比较红掌品种的遗传变异
采用起始密码子靶向(SCoT)、保守DNA衍生多态性(CDDP)和多态性DNA随机扩增(RAPD) 3种分子标记对10个红掌品种的遗传多样性进行了评价。RAPD、SCoT和CDDP的多态性指数含量(PIC)分别为0.39、0.42和0.37。结果表明,这三种分子标记在估计遗传多样性方面具有几乎相同的潜力。利用SCoT、CDDP和RAPD进行聚类分析,将品种划分为3个不同的聚类。SCoT与CDDP相似矩阵呈显著正相关(r = 0.76, p < 0.01)。这是首次在一组红掌品种中比较了两种靶向DNA区域分子标记(SCoT和CDDP)与RAPD技术的效率。结果表明,SCOT、CDDP和RAPD指纹图谱技术对红掌品种的多态性检测能力较强。植物组织崇拜。与生物技术,28(2):171-182,2018 (12)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信