Leveraging Mixed Methods Designs for Promoting Evaluation and Evaluation Capacity

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
S. Mahato, Krisanna Machtmes, Bradley A. Cohen
{"title":"Leveraging Mixed Methods Designs for Promoting Evaluation and Evaluation Capacity","authors":"S. Mahato, Krisanna Machtmes, Bradley A. Cohen","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.71288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limited evaluation capacity, power dynamics, and resource constraints act as organizational barriers that inhibit evaluations in higher education contexts. Evaluation capacity promotes evaluation and minimizes the impact of these barriers.Embedding a synergistic combination of qualitative and quantitative methods withinan evaluation and evaluation capacity building (ECB) initiative was our attempt to address these organizational barriers. In this practice note, we illustrate how MM designs catalyze evaluative thinking that promotes evaluation and supports ECB efforts. Our use and integration of MM strategies to build evaluation capacity andinfuse evaluation into organizational culture informs higher education evaluation capacity-building initiatives.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.71288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited evaluation capacity, power dynamics, and resource constraints act as organizational barriers that inhibit evaluations in higher education contexts. Evaluation capacity promotes evaluation and minimizes the impact of these barriers.Embedding a synergistic combination of qualitative and quantitative methods withinan evaluation and evaluation capacity building (ECB) initiative was our attempt to address these organizational barriers. In this practice note, we illustrate how MM designs catalyze evaluative thinking that promotes evaluation and supports ECB efforts. Our use and integration of MM strategies to build evaluation capacity andinfuse evaluation into organizational culture informs higher education evaluation capacity-building initiatives.
利用混合方法设计提高评估和评估能力
有限的评估能力、权力动态和资源约束是阻碍高等教育环境下评估的组织障碍。评价能力促进评价并尽量减少这些障碍的影响。在评估和评估能力建设(ECB)倡议中嵌入定性和定量方法的协同组合是我们解决这些组织障碍的尝试。在本实践笔记中,我们说明了MM设计如何促进评估思维,从而促进评估并支持欧洲央行的努力。我们使用和整合MM策略来建立评估能力,并将评估融入组织文化,为高等教育评估能力建设倡议提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信