Hengzhao Zhuang , Yang Jiao , Xin Li , Jingping Yu , Juying Zhou , Lili Wang
{"title":"Effect of Endostar combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer","authors":"Hengzhao Zhuang , Yang Jiao , Xin Li , Jingping Yu , Juying Zhou , Lili Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the value of Endostar in the clinical application of locally advanced cervical cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 107 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the Department of Radiotherapy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. There were 30 cases in the Endostar combined with CCRT (E-CCRT) group and 77 in the CCRT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding factors. The short-term efficacy and long-term survival rate were compared between the E-CCRT group and the CCRT group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After matching, the objective response rates in the E-CCRT group and CCRT group were 86.7% and 63.3%, respectively, with statistically significant difference (<em>χ</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> <em>=</em> 4.356<em>, P</em> = 0.037). But there were no statistically significant differences in the disease control rates (96.7% <em>vs.</em> 86.7%, <em>χ</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> <em>=</em> 0.873<em>, P =</em> 0.350), 3-year overall survival (OS) rates (86.7% <em>vs.</em> 83.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.681), and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (both 76.7% and 76.7%, <em>P</em> = 0.869). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>E-CCRT can improve the response of locally advanced cervical cancer patients without increasing the occurrence of adverse reactions, and has the potential to become a new treatment regimen for cervical cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 104-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555723000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
To explore the value of Endostar in the clinical application of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Methods
A total of 107 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the Department of Radiotherapy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. There were 30 cases in the Endostar combined with CCRT (E-CCRT) group and 77 in the CCRT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding factors. The short-term efficacy and long-term survival rate were compared between the E-CCRT group and the CCRT group.
Results
After matching, the objective response rates in the E-CCRT group and CCRT group were 86.7% and 63.3%, respectively, with statistically significant difference (χ2= 4.356, P = 0.037). But there were no statistically significant differences in the disease control rates (96.7% vs. 86.7%, χ2= 0.873, P = 0.350), 3-year overall survival (OS) rates (86.7% vs. 83.3%, P = 0.681), and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (both 76.7% and 76.7%, P = 0.869). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups.
Conclusions
E-CCRT can improve the response of locally advanced cervical cancer patients without increasing the occurrence of adverse reactions, and has the potential to become a new treatment regimen for cervical cancer.
目的探讨恩度在局部晚期宫颈癌的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月在苏州大学第一附属医院和常州市第二人民医院放疗科接受同步放化疗(CCRT)的局部晚期宫颈癌患者107例。恩度联合CCRT (E-CCRT)组30例,CCRT组77例。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于减少混杂因素。比较E-CCRT组和CCRT组的近期疗效和长期生存率。结果配对后,E-CCRT组和CCRT组的客观有效率分别为86.7%和63.3%,差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 4.356, P = 0.037)。两组疾病控制率(96.7% vs. 86.7%, χ2 = 0.873, P = 0.350)、3年总生存率(86.7% vs. 83.3%, P = 0.681)、3年无病生存率(76.7% vs. 76.7%, P = 0.869)差异均无统计学意义。两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。结论- ccrt能提高局部晚期宫颈癌患者的治疗效果,且不增加不良反应的发生,有潜力成为宫颈癌的一种新的治疗方案。