Rebracketing (Gliederungsverschiebung) and the Early Merge Principle

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Diachronica Pub Date : 2019-12-18 DOI:10.1075/dia.00015.wei
H. Weiß
{"title":"Rebracketing (Gliederungsverschiebung) and the Early Merge Principle","authors":"H. Weiß","doi":"10.1075/dia.00015.wei","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The concept of Gliederungsverschiebung (rebracketing) was introduced by the Neogrammarians and it is probably the first explanation of syntactic change proper. Originally, it was conceived of to explain the emergence of the complementizer dass “that”, which was held to go back to a demonstrative pronoun that refers cataphorically to a following main clause and which was eventually reanalyzed as introducing the second clause. This paper presents several examples of rebracketing (mainly from various stages of German) and argues that rebracketing is only possible if the clause whose boundary is shifted is embedded under and selected by a lexical head that is eventually reanalyzed as a complementizer. This condition on rebracketing follows from the fact that otherwise, the respective clause would be a phase and no longer accessible for operations from outside (thus excluding rebracketing). Additionally, the paper argues that rebracketing is economy-driven in that it minimizes the structure and it is motivated by the Principle of Early Merge that applies whenever no further movement follows.","PeriodicalId":44637,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":"36 1","pages":"509-545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.00015.wei","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract The concept of Gliederungsverschiebung (rebracketing) was introduced by the Neogrammarians and it is probably the first explanation of syntactic change proper. Originally, it was conceived of to explain the emergence of the complementizer dass “that”, which was held to go back to a demonstrative pronoun that refers cataphorically to a following main clause and which was eventually reanalyzed as introducing the second clause. This paper presents several examples of rebracketing (mainly from various stages of German) and argues that rebracketing is only possible if the clause whose boundary is shifted is embedded under and selected by a lexical head that is eventually reanalyzed as a complementizer. This condition on rebracketing follows from the fact that otherwise, the respective clause would be a phase and no longer accessible for operations from outside (thus excluding rebracketing). Additionally, the paper argues that rebracketing is economy-driven in that it minimizes the structure and it is motivated by the Principle of Early Merge that applies whenever no further movement follows.
重新包装(Gliederungsverschiebung)和早期合并原则
摘要新语法学家引入了Gliderungsverschiebung(再包装)的概念,它可能是对句法变化本身的第一种解释。最初,它被认为是为了解释补语词dass“that”的出现,该补语词被认为可以追溯到指示代词,该指示代词指代后面的主句,最终被重新分析为引入第二个从句。本文列举了几个重新包装的例子(主要来自德语的各个阶段),并认为只有当边界被转移的从句被嵌入并被最终被重新分析为补语词的词头所选择时,重新包装才是可能的。重新包装的这一条件源于这样一个事实:否则,相应的条款将是一个阶段,不再可从外部进行操作(因此不包括重新包装)。此外,该论文认为,品牌重塑是经济驱动的,因为它最大限度地减少了结构,并受到早期合并原则的激励,该原则适用于任何没有进一步行动的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diachronica
Diachronica Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Diachronica provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of information concerning all aspects of language change in any and all languages of the globe. Contributions which combine theoretical interest and philological acumen are especially welcome. Diachronica appears three times per year, publishing articles, review articles, book reviews, and a miscellanea section including notes, reports and discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信