Construction of land-use change matrix and estimation of greenhouse gas inventory focusing on settlements in South Korea

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sol-E Choi, Segi Hong, Cholho Song, Jiwon Kim, Whijin Kim, Ram Ha, Woo-Kyun Lee
{"title":"Construction of land-use change matrix and estimation of greenhouse gas inventory focusing on settlements in South Korea","authors":"Sol-E Choi,&nbsp;Segi Hong,&nbsp;Cholho Song,&nbsp;Jiwon Kim,&nbsp;Whijin Kim,&nbsp;Ram Ha,&nbsp;Woo-Kyun Lee","doi":"10.1186/s13021-023-00223-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Five ministries are involved in estimating the greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory in the South Korean land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors. However, these ministries have not established a consistent land classification standard between land-use categories. Therefore, the GHG inventory is estimated at the approach 1 level with no spatial clarity between land-use categories. Moreover, the settlements category is not estimated because activity data and the spatial scope are lacking. This study proposed a methodology for constructing a land-use change (LUC) matrix in the LULUCF sector for improving approach level and estimating the GHG inventory in the settlements.</p><h3>Result</h3><p>We examined 10 sets of spatiotemporal data in South Korea to construct a LUC matrix. To maintain consistency in the spatial land classification, we constructed a LUC matrix using cadastral maps, which provide useful data for consistent land-use classification in South Korea. The LUC matrix was divided into remaining and land-converted settlements between 2005 and 2019 with estimated areas of 878,393.17 and 203,260.42 ha, respectively. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, according to Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change’s Guideline Tier 1, were estimated at 18.94 MtCO<sub>2</sub> for 15 years, with an annual CO<sub>2</sub> emission of 1.26 MtCO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>. CO<sub>2</sub> emission by land conversion type was found to be the largest at 16.93 MtCO<sub>2</sub> in the case of forest converted to settlements. In addition, the area with the largest CO<sub>2</sub> emission density was Sejong-si at 7.59 tCO<sub>2</sub>/ha.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on reviewing available spatial data in South Korea, it is possible to improve Approach 3, which is more advanced than previous Approach 1 in the settlement category. In addition, the national GHG inventory also can be estimated by our constructed LUC matrix and activity data in this study. Under the many discussions about developing the Approach system, this study can provide in-detail information on developing LUC in South Korea in the settlement category as well as suggesting a methodology for constructing the LUC matrix for countries with similar problems to South Korea.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-023-00223-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-023-00223-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Five ministries are involved in estimating the greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory in the South Korean land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors. However, these ministries have not established a consistent land classification standard between land-use categories. Therefore, the GHG inventory is estimated at the approach 1 level with no spatial clarity between land-use categories. Moreover, the settlements category is not estimated because activity data and the spatial scope are lacking. This study proposed a methodology for constructing a land-use change (LUC) matrix in the LULUCF sector for improving approach level and estimating the GHG inventory in the settlements.

Result

We examined 10 sets of spatiotemporal data in South Korea to construct a LUC matrix. To maintain consistency in the spatial land classification, we constructed a LUC matrix using cadastral maps, which provide useful data for consistent land-use classification in South Korea. The LUC matrix was divided into remaining and land-converted settlements between 2005 and 2019 with estimated areas of 878,393.17 and 203,260.42 ha, respectively. CO2 emissions, according to Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change’s Guideline Tier 1, were estimated at 18.94 MtCO2 for 15 years, with an annual CO2 emission of 1.26 MtCO2 yr−1. CO2 emission by land conversion type was found to be the largest at 16.93 MtCO2 in the case of forest converted to settlements. In addition, the area with the largest CO2 emission density was Sejong-si at 7.59 tCO2/ha.

Conclusion

Based on reviewing available spatial data in South Korea, it is possible to improve Approach 3, which is more advanced than previous Approach 1 in the settlement category. In addition, the national GHG inventory also can be estimated by our constructed LUC matrix and activity data in this study. Under the many discussions about developing the Approach system, this study can provide in-detail information on developing LUC in South Korea in the settlement category as well as suggesting a methodology for constructing the LUC matrix for countries with similar problems to South Korea.

韩国聚落土地利用变化矩阵构建与温室气体清单估算
五个部门参与了韩国土地利用、土地利用变化和林业(LULUCF)部门的温室气体(GHG)库存估算。但是,这些部委没有在土地使用类别之间建立一致的土地分类标准。因此,估算的温室气体库存量处于接近1的水平,土地利用类别之间没有空间清晰度。此外,由于缺乏活动数据和空间范围,没有对聚落类别进行估计。本研究提出了一种构建土地利用变化(LUC)矩阵的方法,以提高方法水平和估算住区的温室气体清单。结果分析了韩国10组时空数据,构建了LUC矩阵。为了保持空间土地分类的一致性,我们使用地籍图构建了土地利用价值矩阵,这为韩国土地利用分类的一致性提供了有用的数据。在2005年至2019年期间,土地覆盖范围矩阵分为剩余聚落和土地转化聚落,估计面积分别为878393.17公顷和20320.42公顷。根据政府间气候变化专门委员会的第一级指南,二氧化碳排放量在15年内估计为1894万吨二氧化碳,每年二氧化碳排放量为126万吨二氧化碳。按土地转化类型划分的二氧化碳排放量最大,在森林转化为住区的情况下为16.93亿吨二氧化碳。二氧化碳排放密度最大的地区是世宗市,为7.59 tCO2/ha。结论在回顾韩国现有空间数据的基础上,可以对方法3进行改进,该方法在聚落类上比以前的方法1更先进。此外,利用本文构建的土地利用/土地覆盖矩阵和活动数据,还可以估算出全国温室气体库存量。在众多关于开发方法系统的讨论中,本研究可以为韩国在聚落类别中开发土地利用能力提供详细的信息,并为与韩国问题相似的国家构建土地利用能力矩阵提供方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信