Impact resistance of porosity-free fiber-reinforced concrete (PFFRC) beams under low-velocity impact loading

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
N. Kishi, M. Komuro, K. Kono, Tomoki Kawarai
{"title":"Impact resistance of porosity-free fiber-reinforced concrete (PFFRC) beams under low-velocity impact loading","authors":"N. Kishi, M. Komuro, K. Kono, Tomoki Kawarai","doi":"10.1177/20414196211069573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ultrahigh-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) is an advanced cement-based composite material. Its ultrahigh compressive strength and high ductility can enable the downsizing of structural members, with special application to high-rise buildings. These excellent mechanical properties also allow its application in protective structures to resist high-speed penetration, low-velocity impact, and blast loading. UHPFRC with a compressive strength of approximately 150–200 MPa has traditionally been used to investigate the impact resistance of structural members under low-velocity impact loading. Recently, however, porosity-free concrete of the 400 MPa class of compressive strength has been developed. In this paper, to investigate the effects of the concrete strength and the steel fiber volume fraction on the impact resistance of porosity-free fiber-reinforced concrete (PFFRC) members, static and drop-weight impact loading tests were conducted on PFFRC beams by varying the volume fraction of steel fiber from 1 to 3.5%. As reference beams, 90 MPa high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) beams with a 2% fiber volume fraction and normal-strength concrete (NSC) beams without stirrups and steel fibers were also tested. The results obtained from this study were as follows: (1) the static load-carrying capacity of a PFFRC beam can be enhanced by more than two and three times that of an NSC beam by adding 1 and 3.5% volume fractions of steel fiber, respectively; (2) a PFFRC beam with 3.5% fiber had the greatest impact resistance of all the beams considered in this study, and the beam with 2% fiber volume had the second-greatest performance, but the difference was small; (3) even though an HSFRC beam with 2% fiber had a smaller static load-carrying capacity than a PFFRC beam with 1% fiber, the former exhibited a slightly greater impact resistance than the latter because the bridging effect of the steel fibers has a greater influence under impact loading than under static loading.","PeriodicalId":46272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Protective Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Protective Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196211069573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ultrahigh-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) is an advanced cement-based composite material. Its ultrahigh compressive strength and high ductility can enable the downsizing of structural members, with special application to high-rise buildings. These excellent mechanical properties also allow its application in protective structures to resist high-speed penetration, low-velocity impact, and blast loading. UHPFRC with a compressive strength of approximately 150–200 MPa has traditionally been used to investigate the impact resistance of structural members under low-velocity impact loading. Recently, however, porosity-free concrete of the 400 MPa class of compressive strength has been developed. In this paper, to investigate the effects of the concrete strength and the steel fiber volume fraction on the impact resistance of porosity-free fiber-reinforced concrete (PFFRC) members, static and drop-weight impact loading tests were conducted on PFFRC beams by varying the volume fraction of steel fiber from 1 to 3.5%. As reference beams, 90 MPa high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) beams with a 2% fiber volume fraction and normal-strength concrete (NSC) beams without stirrups and steel fibers were also tested. The results obtained from this study were as follows: (1) the static load-carrying capacity of a PFFRC beam can be enhanced by more than two and three times that of an NSC beam by adding 1 and 3.5% volume fractions of steel fiber, respectively; (2) a PFFRC beam with 3.5% fiber had the greatest impact resistance of all the beams considered in this study, and the beam with 2% fiber volume had the second-greatest performance, but the difference was small; (3) even though an HSFRC beam with 2% fiber had a smaller static load-carrying capacity than a PFFRC beam with 1% fiber, the former exhibited a slightly greater impact resistance than the latter because the bridging effect of the steel fibers has a greater influence under impact loading than under static loading.
无孔隙纤维增强混凝土(PFFRC)梁在低速冲击荷载下的抗冲击性能
超高性能纤维混凝土是一种先进的水泥基复合材料。其超高抗压强度和高延性可使结构构件小型化,特别适用于高层建筑。这些优异的机械性能也使其能够应用于防护结构中,以抵抗高速穿透、低速冲击和爆炸载荷。抗压强度约为150–200 MPa的UHPFRC传统上用于研究结构构件在低速冲击载荷下的抗冲击性。然而,最近已经开发出抗压强度等级为400MPa的无孔隙混凝土。为了研究混凝土强度和钢纤维体积分数对无孔纤维混凝土(PFFRC)构件抗冲击性能的影响,通过将钢纤维体积百分比从1%改变到3.5%,对PFFRC梁进行了静态和落锤冲击载荷试验,对纤维体积分数为2%的90MPa高强度纤维混凝土(HSFRC)梁和无箍筋和钢纤维的普通强度混凝土(NSC)梁进行了试验。研究结果如下:(1)加入1%和3.5%体积分数的钢纤维,PFFRC梁的静载能力可分别提高NSC梁的两倍和三倍以上;(2) 在本研究中考虑的所有梁中,纤维含量为3.5%的PFFRC梁具有最大的抗冲击性,纤维体积为2%的梁具有第二大的性能,但差异很小;(3) 即使具有2%纤维的HSFRC梁具有比具有1%纤维的PFFRC梁更小的静态承载能力,但前者表现出比后者略大的抗冲击性,因为钢纤维的桥接效应在冲击载荷下比在静态载荷下具有更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信