Ecological uniqueness across multiple levels of biodiversity in a Chilean watershed

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Jéssica Bórquez, Sandra Sampertegui, Britt N. Wallberg, Diana Coral-Santacruz, Víctor H. Ruiz, Paul B. Samollow, Nicolas Gouin, Angéline Bertin
{"title":"Ecological uniqueness across multiple levels of biodiversity in a Chilean watershed","authors":"Jéssica Bórquez,&nbsp;Sandra Sampertegui,&nbsp;Britt N. Wallberg,&nbsp;Diana Coral-Santacruz,&nbsp;Víctor H. Ruiz,&nbsp;Paul B. Samollow,&nbsp;Nicolas Gouin,&nbsp;Angéline Bertin","doi":"10.1007/s10452-023-10051-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To effectively address biodiversity loss, it is essential to prioritize conservation efforts by identifying areas of high conservation value. Ecological uniqueness is a valuable metric for this purpose that decomposes beta diversity into local contributions to beta diversity (LCBD), thereby measuring the contribution of each site within a region to overall biodiversity variation. LCBD has been used extensively to evaluate ecological uniqueness from community composition data, but biodiversity is a multifaceted concept, and community-based ecological uniqueness may not capture the full range of ecological uniqueness occurring at other levels of biological organization. We investigated ecological uniqueness estimates derived from community and species population levels in a watershed of south-central Chile and analyzed their responses to water and habitat quality variables. Ecological uniqueness was estimated at the community level from fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages and at the population level using genetic and morphological data gathered for two invertebrates, the gastropod <i>Chilina dombeiana</i> and the water bug <i>Aquarius chilensis</i>. Our results revealed low spatial congruence between the levels of ecological uniqueness calculated for these different biodiversity components, with mismatches occurring among sites with high LCBD values. Water and habitat quality were major drivers of beta diversity in this watershed, accounting for 43.8% to 74.3% of the spatial variation in LCBDs, and their effects differed among the ecological uniqueness estimates. Overall, our results underscore the idiosyncratic nature of ecological uniqueness metrics, emphasizing the importance of using multiple components of biodiversity to guide conservation actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8262,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Ecology","volume":"58 2","pages":"139 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10452-023-10051-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To effectively address biodiversity loss, it is essential to prioritize conservation efforts by identifying areas of high conservation value. Ecological uniqueness is a valuable metric for this purpose that decomposes beta diversity into local contributions to beta diversity (LCBD), thereby measuring the contribution of each site within a region to overall biodiversity variation. LCBD has been used extensively to evaluate ecological uniqueness from community composition data, but biodiversity is a multifaceted concept, and community-based ecological uniqueness may not capture the full range of ecological uniqueness occurring at other levels of biological organization. We investigated ecological uniqueness estimates derived from community and species population levels in a watershed of south-central Chile and analyzed their responses to water and habitat quality variables. Ecological uniqueness was estimated at the community level from fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages and at the population level using genetic and morphological data gathered for two invertebrates, the gastropod Chilina dombeiana and the water bug Aquarius chilensis. Our results revealed low spatial congruence between the levels of ecological uniqueness calculated for these different biodiversity components, with mismatches occurring among sites with high LCBD values. Water and habitat quality were major drivers of beta diversity in this watershed, accounting for 43.8% to 74.3% of the spatial variation in LCBDs, and their effects differed among the ecological uniqueness estimates. Overall, our results underscore the idiosyncratic nature of ecological uniqueness metrics, emphasizing the importance of using multiple components of biodiversity to guide conservation actions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

智利流域多层次生物多样性的生态独特性
为了有效应对生物多样性的丧失,必须通过识别具有高保护价值的区域来确定保护工作的优先次序。为此,生态独特性是一个有价值的指标,它可将贝塔多样性分解为地方对贝塔多样性的贡献(LCBD),从而衡量区域内每个地点对整体生物多样性变化的贡献。LCBD已被广泛用于评估群落组成数据中的生态独特性,但生物多样性是一个多层面的概念,基于群落的生态独特性可能无法全面反映生物组织其他层次的生态独特性。我们在智利中南部的一个流域研究了从群落和物种种群水平得出的生态独特性估计值,并分析了它们对水和生境质量变量的反应。根据鱼类和大型无脊椎动物群落对群落层面的生态独特性进行了估算,并利用收集到的两种无脊椎动物(腹足类 Chilina dombeiana 和水虫 Aquarius chilensis)的遗传和形态数据对种群层面的生态独特性进行了估算。我们的研究结果表明,为这些不同的生物多样性组成部分计算出的生态独特性水平之间的空间一致性较低,在 LCBD 值较高的地点之间会出现不匹配。水质和栖息地质量是该流域贝塔多样性的主要驱动因素,占 LCBD 空间变化的 43.8% 到 74.3%,它们对生态独特性估计值的影响也各不相同。总之,我们的研究结果强调了生态独特性指标的特殊性,强调了利用生物多样性的多个组成部分来指导保护行动的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Ecology
Aquatic Ecology 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aquatic Ecology publishes timely, peer-reviewed original papers relating to the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. Papers on fundamental and applied novel research in both the field and the laboratory, including descriptive or experimental studies, will be included in the journal. Preference will be given to studies that address timely and current topics and are integrative and critical in approach. We discourage papers that describe presence and abundance of aquatic biota in local habitats as well as papers that are pure systematic. The journal provides a forum for the aquatic ecologist - limnologist and oceanologist alike- to discuss ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels from individuals to populations, to communities and entire ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信