Víctor del Carmen Avendaño-Porras, Claudia Inés Bohórquez-Olaya, Paola Andrea Lara-Buitagro
{"title":"Escala para medir la significación del pensamiento complejo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje de instituciones de educación superior","authors":"Víctor del Carmen Avendaño-Porras, Claudia Inés Bohórquez-Olaya, Paola Andrea Lara-Buitagro","doi":"10.35197/rx.18.01.2022.09.va","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of complex thought in Higher Education Institutions has been little addressed and understood, since it is still in the intellectual imagination of educational actors that it is a theoretical construct with which problems of formal sciences can be solved, more not of the factual ones; If we add to this that during the Covid-19 pandemic Virtual Learning Environments had to be used with much greater intensity, the challenge of perceiving the concept and merging it with ICTs for the construction of meta-complex virtual environments turns out to be a challenge. The main objective of this document was to develop an instrument to measure the significance of complex thinking in Virtual Learning Environments in Higher Education Institutions; For this purpose, the instrumental methodology of Hernández (2011) was used, applying the validation of experts, using the focus group method, where a value of .77 was obtained, which is considered a good degree of validity. Reliability was also analyzed using Cronbach's Alpha, which showed a value of .780, which is why it is considered adequate. The questionnaire is made up of 63 items, 57 of which are integrated using a 4-level Likert scale; Therefore, it is considered to be a valid and reliable instrument. The instrument proposes to know precisely the relationship that exists between the concept of complex thought and virtuality and how these are merged by educational actors.","PeriodicalId":44156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ra Ximhai","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ra Ximhai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.18.01.2022.09.va","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The concept of complex thought in Higher Education Institutions has been little addressed and understood, since it is still in the intellectual imagination of educational actors that it is a theoretical construct with which problems of formal sciences can be solved, more not of the factual ones; If we add to this that during the Covid-19 pandemic Virtual Learning Environments had to be used with much greater intensity, the challenge of perceiving the concept and merging it with ICTs for the construction of meta-complex virtual environments turns out to be a challenge. The main objective of this document was to develop an instrument to measure the significance of complex thinking in Virtual Learning Environments in Higher Education Institutions; For this purpose, the instrumental methodology of Hernández (2011) was used, applying the validation of experts, using the focus group method, where a value of .77 was obtained, which is considered a good degree of validity. Reliability was also analyzed using Cronbach's Alpha, which showed a value of .780, which is why it is considered adequate. The questionnaire is made up of 63 items, 57 of which are integrated using a 4-level Likert scale; Therefore, it is considered to be a valid and reliable instrument. The instrument proposes to know precisely the relationship that exists between the concept of complex thought and virtuality and how these are merged by educational actors.