Comparison of computer vision models in application to pollen classification using light scattering

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Gintautas Daunys, Laura Šukienė, Lukas Vaitkevičius, Gediminas Valiulis, Mikhail Sofiev, Ingrida Šaulienė
{"title":"Comparison of computer vision models in application to pollen classification using light scattering","authors":"Gintautas Daunys,&nbsp;Laura Šukienė,&nbsp;Lukas Vaitkevičius,&nbsp;Gediminas Valiulis,&nbsp;Mikhail Sofiev,&nbsp;Ingrida Šaulienė","doi":"10.1007/s10453-022-09769-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the use of pollen elastically scattered light images for species identification. The aim was to identify the best recognition algorithms for pollen classification based on the scattering images. A series of laboratory experiments with a Rapid-E device of Plair S.A. was conducted collecting scattering images and fluorescence spectra from pollen of 15 plant genera. The collected scattering data were supplied to 32 different setups of 8 computer vision models based on deep neural networks. The models were trained to classify the pollen types, and their performance was compared for the test sub-samples withheld from the training. Evaluation showed that most of the tested computer vision models convincingly outperform the basic convolutional neural network used in our previous studies: the accuracy gain was approaching 10% for best setups. The models of the Weakly Supervised Object Detection approach turned out to be the most accurate, but also slow. However, even the best setups still did not provide sufficient recognition accuracy barely reaching 65%–70% in the repeated tests. They also showed many false positives when applied to real-life time series collected by Rapid-E. Similar to the previous studies, fusion of the new scattering models with the fluorescence-based identification demonstrated almost 15% higher skills than either of the approaches alone reaching 77–83% of the overall classification accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7718,"journal":{"name":"Aerobiologia","volume":"40 1","pages":"109 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10453-022-09769-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10453-022-09769-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the use of pollen elastically scattered light images for species identification. The aim was to identify the best recognition algorithms for pollen classification based on the scattering images. A series of laboratory experiments with a Rapid-E device of Plair S.A. was conducted collecting scattering images and fluorescence spectra from pollen of 15 plant genera. The collected scattering data were supplied to 32 different setups of 8 computer vision models based on deep neural networks. The models were trained to classify the pollen types, and their performance was compared for the test sub-samples withheld from the training. Evaluation showed that most of the tested computer vision models convincingly outperform the basic convolutional neural network used in our previous studies: the accuracy gain was approaching 10% for best setups. The models of the Weakly Supervised Object Detection approach turned out to be the most accurate, but also slow. However, even the best setups still did not provide sufficient recognition accuracy barely reaching 65%–70% in the repeated tests. They also showed many false positives when applied to real-life time series collected by Rapid-E. Similar to the previous studies, fusion of the new scattering models with the fluorescence-based identification demonstrated almost 15% higher skills than either of the approaches alone reaching 77–83% of the overall classification accuracy.

Abstract Image

计算机视觉模型在光散射花粉分类中的应用比较
本研究调查了利用花粉弹性散射光图像进行物种识别的情况。目的是根据散射图像确定花粉分类的最佳识别算法。使用 Plair S.A. 公司的 Rapid-E 设备进行了一系列实验室实验,收集了 15 个植物属的花粉散射图像和荧光光谱。收集到的散射数据被提供给 8 个基于深度神经网络的计算机视觉模型的 32 个不同设置。对这些模型进行了花粉类型分类训练,并比较了它们在测试子样本中的表现。评估结果表明,大多数测试的计算机视觉模型都令人信服地优于我们之前研究中使用的基本卷积神经网络:最佳设置的准确率提高接近 10%。弱监督物体检测方法的模型最准确,但速度也较慢。然而,即使是最好的设置,在重复测试中也无法提供足够的识别准确率,勉强达到 65%-70%。在应用于 Rapid-E 收集的真实时间序列时,它们还显示出许多误报。与之前的研究类似,将新的散射模型与基于荧光的识别方法相融合,比单独使用其中一种方法高出近 15%,总体分类准确率达到 77-83%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerobiologia
Aerobiologia 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Associated with the International Association for Aerobiology, Aerobiologia is an international medium for original research and review articles in the interdisciplinary fields of aerobiology and interaction of human, plant and animal systems on the biosphere. Coverage includes bioaerosols, transport mechanisms, biometeorology, climatology, air-sea interaction, land-surface/atmosphere interaction, biological pollution, biological input to global change, microbiology, aeromycology, aeropalynology, arthropod dispersal and environmental policy. Emphasis is placed on respiratory allergology, plant pathology, pest management, biological weathering and biodeterioration, indoor air quality, air-conditioning technology, industrial aerobiology and more. Aerobiologia serves aerobiologists, and other professionals in medicine, public health, industrial and environmental hygiene, biological sciences, agriculture, atmospheric physics, botany, environmental science and cultural heritage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信