Hydration status count for weight gain on pregnancy period

IF 1 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Nutrition & Food Science Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1108/nfs-03-2021-0096

Erry Y Mulyani, D. Angkasa, Enrico Stanin, I. Jus’at

{"title":"Hydration status count for weight gain on pregnancy period","authors":"Erry Y Mulyani, D. Angkasa, Enrico Stanin, I. Jus’at","doi":"10.1108/nfs-03-2021-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn Indonesia, 29.3% of Indonesian women were obese. Dehydrated women have 1.6 times higher risk of becoming obese than normal ones. This study was aimed to further explore the association between gestational weight gain (GWG) and maternal hydration status.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis longitudinal study involved 50 pregnant women aged 18–35 years. Subject identity, age, parity and household expenses were collected using questionnaire. Urine specific gravity (USG) was used as an indicator for hydration status. Venous blood was collected to measured haemoglobin (Hb) by anemometer method. Anthropometric data such as pre-pregnancy weight, maternal body weight, GWG, body mass index (BMI) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) was collected using standardized tools. Dietary and total water intake (TWI) were measured through three consecutive days of a 24-h food recall. Pearson’s correlation, independent t-test and analysis of covariance were used to appraise the hypothesis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe subject’s mean age was 29.3 ± 5.6 years; BMI was 23.5 ± 4.1 kg/m2. MUAC (28.2 ± 4.0 cm) and Hb (11.5 ± 1.0 g/dl) were still in the normal range. Most subjects were well hydrated, with an average USG of 1.016 g/mL. GWG and TWI are significantly correlated (p < 0.01). Based on the hydration status, after corrected with TWI, GWG was not significantly different.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIt calls to mind that nutrition and water intake, alongside weight gain monitoring during pregnancy, are part of an effort to prevent pregnancy risks.\n","PeriodicalId":19376,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-03-2021-0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose In Indonesia, 29.3% of Indonesian women were obese. Dehydrated women have 1.6 times higher risk of becoming obese than normal ones. This study was aimed to further explore the association between gestational weight gain (GWG) and maternal hydration status. Design/methodology/approach This longitudinal study involved 50 pregnant women aged 18–35 years. Subject identity, age, parity and household expenses were collected using questionnaire. Urine specific gravity (USG) was used as an indicator for hydration status. Venous blood was collected to measured haemoglobin (Hb) by anemometer method. Anthropometric data such as pre-pregnancy weight, maternal body weight, GWG, body mass index (BMI) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) was collected using standardized tools. Dietary and total water intake (TWI) were measured through three consecutive days of a 24-h food recall. Pearson’s correlation, independent t-test and analysis of covariance were used to appraise the hypothesis. Findings The subject’s mean age was 29.3 ± 5.6 years; BMI was 23.5 ± 4.1 kg/m2. MUAC (28.2 ± 4.0 cm) and Hb (11.5 ± 1.0 g/dl) were still in the normal range. Most subjects were well hydrated, with an average USG of 1.016 g/mL. GWG and TWI are significantly correlated (p < 0.01). Based on the hydration status, after corrected with TWI, GWG was not significantly different. Originality/value It calls to mind that nutrition and water intake, alongside weight gain monitoring during pregnancy, are part of an effort to prevent pregnancy risks.

查看原文本刊更多论文

妊娠期体重增加的水合状态计数

目的在印度尼西亚，29.3%的印度尼西亚妇女肥胖。脱水的女性肥胖的风险是正常女性的1.6倍。本研究旨在进一步探讨妊娠期体重增加(GWG)与母体水合状态的关系。设计/方法/方法本纵向研究涉及50名18-35岁的孕妇。采用问卷调查法收集受试者身份、年龄、平价、家庭支出等信息。尿比重(USG)作为水合状态的指标。采集静脉血，用风速计法测定血红蛋白(Hb)。采用标准化工具收集孕前体重、产妇体重、GWG、体重指数(BMI)和中上臂围(MUAC)等人体测量数据。通过连续三天的24小时食物召回来测量饮食和总水摄入量(TWI)。采用Pearson相关、独立t检验和协方差分析对假设进行评价。研究结果:患者平均年龄29.3±5.6岁;BMI为23.5±4.1 kg/m2。MUAC(28.2±4.0 cm)、Hb(11.5±1.0 g/dl)均在正常范围内。大多数受试者水分充足，平均USG为1.016 g/mL。GWG与TWI极显著相关(p < 0.01)。根据水化状态，经TWI校正后，GWG无显著差异。创意/价值它提醒我们，营养和水的摄入，以及孕期体重的监测，都是预防怀孕风险的一部分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nutrition & Food Science FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Nutrition & Food Science* (NFS) is an international, double blind peer-reviewed journal offering accessible and comprehensive coverage of food, beverage and nutrition research. The journal draws out the practical and social applications of research, demonstrates best practice through applied research and case studies and showcases innovative or controversial practices and points of view. The journal is an invaluable resource to inform individuals, organisations and the public on modern thinking, research and attitudes to food science and nutrition. NFS welcomes empirical and applied research, viewpoint papers, conceptual and technical papers, case studies, meta-analysis studies, literature reviews and general reviews which take a scientific approach to the following topics: -Attitudes to food and nutrition -Healthy eating/ nutritional public health initiatives, policies and legislation -Clinical and community nutrition and health (including public health and multiple or complex co-morbidities) -Nutrition in different cultural and ethnic groups -Nutrition during pregnancy, lactation, childhood, and young adult years -Nutrition for adults and older people -Nutrition in the workplace -Nutrition in lower and middle income countries (incl. comparisons with higher income countries) -Food science and technology, including food processing and microbiological quality -Genetically engineered foods -Food safety / quality, including chemical, physical and microbiological analysis of how these aspects effect health or nutritional quality of foodstuffs