BIOMECHANICS OF PENETRATING TRAUMA AND INJURY MITIGATING PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN GUARDRAIL MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES

Sri Kumar, Kevin D. Schrum, D. Sicking, Devan Holder, Colin Wein, M. McCort
{"title":"BIOMECHANICS OF PENETRATING TRAUMA AND INJURY MITIGATING PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN GUARDRAIL MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES","authors":"Sri Kumar, Kevin D. Schrum, D. Sicking, Devan Holder, Colin Wein, M. McCort","doi":"10.34107/yhpn9422.04128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present study is two-fold. First, the elucidation of the biomechanics of penetrating trauma as a result of guardrail intruding into the occupant compartment. Second, the evaluation of the biomechanical efficacy of hybrid tension-compression guardrails to better protect occupants. The nine fatally guardrail penetrating crashes occurred between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed to study the mechanism of injuries. Four car-to-guardrail crash tests were conducted using a hybrid guardrail that integrated the commonly used W-beam with a new design of tension-based end terminal. The test included the impact of a bogey-type platform, small sedan vehicles, and a pick-up truck at highway speeds onto the guardrail. The impact orientation was varied to simulate the frontal and oblique corner crashes with a speed ranging from 90 to 111 kph. The real-world studies showed that the fatal injuries were due to impaling guardrail regardless of vehicular speed and size. The occupants not in the trajectory of the guardrail in the same vehicle sustained minor injuries despite experiencing a similar energy level. In these cases, the crash severity was survivable without the guardrail penetration. The mean pre-impact speed, change in speed, and vehicular acceleration was 117 kph, 20 kph, and 97 m/sec2, respectively. The hybrid guardrail system deflected the vehicle without any penetration into the occupant compartment. The mean peak accelerations in crash tests were below injurious threshold levels. The present research shows that the hybrid guardrail system not only eliminated the intrusion into occupant survival space but also deflected the vehicle.","PeriodicalId":75599,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical sciences instrumentation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical sciences instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34107/yhpn9422.04128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the present study is two-fold. First, the elucidation of the biomechanics of penetrating trauma as a result of guardrail intruding into the occupant compartment. Second, the evaluation of the biomechanical efficacy of hybrid tension-compression guardrails to better protect occupants. The nine fatally guardrail penetrating crashes occurred between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed to study the mechanism of injuries. Four car-to-guardrail crash tests were conducted using a hybrid guardrail that integrated the commonly used W-beam with a new design of tension-based end terminal. The test included the impact of a bogey-type platform, small sedan vehicles, and a pick-up truck at highway speeds onto the guardrail. The impact orientation was varied to simulate the frontal and oblique corner crashes with a speed ranging from 90 to 111 kph. The real-world studies showed that the fatal injuries were due to impaling guardrail regardless of vehicular speed and size. The occupants not in the trajectory of the guardrail in the same vehicle sustained minor injuries despite experiencing a similar energy level. In these cases, the crash severity was survivable without the guardrail penetration. The mean pre-impact speed, change in speed, and vehicular acceleration was 117 kph, 20 kph, and 97 m/sec2, respectively. The hybrid guardrail system deflected the vehicle without any penetration into the occupant compartment. The mean peak accelerations in crash tests were below injurious threshold levels. The present research shows that the hybrid guardrail system not only eliminated the intrusion into occupant survival space but also deflected the vehicle.
机动车护栏碰撞穿透伤及减伤防护措施的生物力学研究
本研究的目的是双重的。首先,阐明了由于护栏侵入乘员室而造成的穿透性创伤的生物力学。其次,评价了拉压混合护栏对乘员的生物力学保护效果。分析了2016年至2019年发生的9起致命的护栏穿透事故,以研究伤害机制。使用混合护栏进行了四次汽车与护栏的碰撞试验,该混合护栏将常用的w梁与新设计的基于张力的终端结合在一起。该试验包括以高速公路速度行驶的转向架式平台、小型轿车和皮卡对护栏的冲击。碰撞方向不同,以模拟在90 - 111公里/小时的速度范围内的正面和斜角碰撞。现实世界的研究表明,无论车辆的速度和大小,致命的伤害都是由于刺穿护栏造成的。在同一辆车中,不在护栏轨道上的乘客受了轻伤,尽管经历了相似的能量水平。在这些情况下,即使没有护栏穿透,也能在严重的碰撞中幸存下来。平均碰撞前速度、速度变化和车辆加速度分别为117 kph、20 kph和97 m/sec2。混合动力护栏系统偏转车辆没有任何渗透到乘员室。碰撞测试中的平均峰值加速度低于有害阈值水平。研究表明,混合动力护栏系统不仅消除了对乘员生存空间的侵犯,而且使车辆偏转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信