Critical race theory, books, and ChatGPT: Moving from a ban culture in education to a culture of restoration

Q3 Social Sciences
Lisa M. Harrison, Ellis Hurd, Kathleen M. Brinegar
{"title":"Critical race theory, books, and ChatGPT: Moving from a ban culture in education to a culture of restoration","authors":"Lisa M. Harrison, Ellis Hurd, Kathleen M. Brinegar","doi":"10.1080/00940771.2023.2189862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any person in tune with the national landscape of education is vastly aware of the plethora of proposed–and in some cases passed–state legislated school bans that restrict what students learn and how they are taught in public schools. Such legislation has focused on banning curriculum deemed divisive, teaching socio-emotional learning, teaching about gender and sexuality, using students’ “preferred” pronouns, restricting diversity training for educators, and removing “controversial” books from school libraries. The resurgence of the cultural wars (Hartman, 2019) taking root in education has significant implications for schools, educators, and students (Natanson et al., 2022; Ravitch, 2002; Zimmerman, 2022). For example, in a study of 682 principals, Rogers et al. (2022) found that:","PeriodicalId":37061,"journal":{"name":"Middle School Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2023.2189862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Any person in tune with the national landscape of education is vastly aware of the plethora of proposed–and in some cases passed–state legislated school bans that restrict what students learn and how they are taught in public schools. Such legislation has focused on banning curriculum deemed divisive, teaching socio-emotional learning, teaching about gender and sexuality, using students’ “preferred” pronouns, restricting diversity training for educators, and removing “controversial” books from school libraries. The resurgence of the cultural wars (Hartman, 2019) taking root in education has significant implications for schools, educators, and students (Natanson et al., 2022; Ravitch, 2002; Zimmerman, 2022). For example, in a study of 682 principals, Rogers et al. (2022) found that:
批判种族理论,书籍和聊天:从教育中的禁令文化到恢复文化
任何一个了解国家教育格局的人都非常清楚,州立法的学校禁令数量过多,这些禁令限制了学生在公立学校学习的内容和教学方式。此类立法的重点是禁止被视为分裂性的课程,教授社会情感学习,教授性别和性,使用学生的“首选”代词,限制对教育工作者的多样性培训,并从学校图书馆中删除“有争议”的书籍。文化战争的死灰复燃(Hartman,2019)在教育领域扎根,对学校、教育工作者和学生产生了重大影响(Natanson et al.,2022;拉维奇,2002年;齐默尔曼,2022)。例如,在对682名校长的研究中,Rogers等人(2022)发现:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle School Journal
Middle School Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信