From the vanishing to the virtual: space envisioned in literature

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Ars Aeterna Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.2478/aa-2022-0005
S. Mukherjee
{"title":"From the vanishing to the virtual: space envisioned in literature","authors":"S. Mukherjee","doi":"10.2478/aa-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper contends that space envisioned in literature – which is always inextricably intertwined with time – has never been real. From the bucolic settings in Theocritus’s idylls (which have a pronounced mythical component) to the town in the heart of America in Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, which is narrated in the past tense to be as “once a town”; from the Ptolemaic concept of heaven and hell in Dante’s Divine Comedy to the “unreal cities” in Eliot’s The Waste Land; from the thatched cottages and country churches besides the vanishing village greens in Chaucer, Blake and Austen to the goings-on in the imagined county of Wessex in Hardy’s novels or the invented islands by Swift in Gulliver’s Travels to the retreat to the Walden Pond, to, the fading away of institutional space – whether in the phenomenal world or the space within the human heart – as in Larkin’s “Church Going”, literature worth reading has always been a complex record of what we were (the vanished time-space) to what might become of us in the dystopic time-space narrated with all the horror on the screen that collapses the boundaries between the actual and the virtual. The paper attempts to contemplate on some of these points.","PeriodicalId":37754,"journal":{"name":"Ars Aeterna","volume":"14 1","pages":"50 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Aeterna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aa-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The paper contends that space envisioned in literature – which is always inextricably intertwined with time – has never been real. From the bucolic settings in Theocritus’s idylls (which have a pronounced mythical component) to the town in the heart of America in Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, which is narrated in the past tense to be as “once a town”; from the Ptolemaic concept of heaven and hell in Dante’s Divine Comedy to the “unreal cities” in Eliot’s The Waste Land; from the thatched cottages and country churches besides the vanishing village greens in Chaucer, Blake and Austen to the goings-on in the imagined county of Wessex in Hardy’s novels or the invented islands by Swift in Gulliver’s Travels to the retreat to the Walden Pond, to, the fading away of institutional space – whether in the phenomenal world or the space within the human heart – as in Larkin’s “Church Going”, literature worth reading has always been a complex record of what we were (the vanished time-space) to what might become of us in the dystopic time-space narrated with all the horror on the screen that collapses the boundaries between the actual and the virtual. The paper attempts to contemplate on some of these points.
从消失到虚拟:文学中的想象空间
摘要本文认为,文学中所设想的空间——总是与时间密不可分——从来都不是真实的。从Theocritus田园诗中的田园场景(有明显的神话成分)到Rachel Carson的《寂静的春天》中的美国中心小镇,该作品用过去时叙述为“曾经的小镇”;从但丁《神曲》中托勒密的天堂和地狱概念,到艾略特《荒原》中的“虚幻城市”;从乔叟、布莱克和奥斯汀笔下消失的乡村绿地之外的茅草屋和乡村教堂,到哈迪小说中想象中的威塞克斯郡发生的事情,或斯威夫特在《格列佛游记》中发明的岛屿,再到瓦尔登湖的静修,制度空间的消失——无论是在现象世界还是在人类内心的空间——就像拉金的《去教堂》中一样,值得一读的文学一直是一个复杂的记录,记录了我们是什么(消失的时空),以及我们在反乌托邦时空中可能会变成什么样子,讲述了屏幕上所有的恐怖,这些恐怖打破了现实和虚拟之间的界限。本文试图对其中的一些问题进行思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ars Aeterna
Ars Aeterna Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary journal focused on the questions of art and its importance in the contemporary world for the development of culture, mutual understanding, and the human Self.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信