BIPOC voices in ocean sciences: A qualitative exploration of factors impacting career retention

Q1 Social Sciences
Jasmin Graham, Gina Hodsdon, Aly Busse, M. P. Crosby
{"title":"BIPOC voices in ocean sciences: A qualitative exploration of factors impacting career retention","authors":"Jasmin Graham, Gina Hodsdon, Aly Busse, M. P. Crosby","doi":"10.1080/10899995.2022.2052553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this study was to understand the factors that impact the recruitment and retention of scientists that identify as Black, Indigenous or as People of Color (BIPOC). A total of 47 BIPOC participants who are currently working or have worked in the field of marine science were recruited using a non-probability snowball sampling method to participate in semi-structured interviews which were analyzed using Astin’s Input-Environment-Output framework and Social Cognitive Career Theory. Several interventions which have been put in place to address the systemic issues that have led to the exclusion of certain groups including BIPOC-focused programs, research experiences and mentorship were identified as having positive impacts on the cognitive-personal outcomes of sense of belonging (feeling of acceptance within a group), science identity (the self-categorization of one’s self as a ‘science person’) and self-efficacy (belief in one’s ability to succeed). Several factors including discrimination, lack of allyship and negative research or mentorship experiences were identified as factors that greatly reduce these cognitive-personal outcomes. In addition, all three interviewees who left the field of marine science mentioned research experiences where they felt unsupported as a contributing factor to them leaving the field. This study serves to exemplify that systemic issues that have been observed in other STEM fields exist in the ocean science field as well. The study uses a novel framework to present and analyze trends in the experiences of BIPOC ocean scientists around the world. Supplemental data for this article can be acceessed here.","PeriodicalId":35858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geoscience Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geoscience Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2022.2052553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to understand the factors that impact the recruitment and retention of scientists that identify as Black, Indigenous or as People of Color (BIPOC). A total of 47 BIPOC participants who are currently working or have worked in the field of marine science were recruited using a non-probability snowball sampling method to participate in semi-structured interviews which were analyzed using Astin’s Input-Environment-Output framework and Social Cognitive Career Theory. Several interventions which have been put in place to address the systemic issues that have led to the exclusion of certain groups including BIPOC-focused programs, research experiences and mentorship were identified as having positive impacts on the cognitive-personal outcomes of sense of belonging (feeling of acceptance within a group), science identity (the self-categorization of one’s self as a ‘science person’) and self-efficacy (belief in one’s ability to succeed). Several factors including discrimination, lack of allyship and negative research or mentorship experiences were identified as factors that greatly reduce these cognitive-personal outcomes. In addition, all three interviewees who left the field of marine science mentioned research experiences where they felt unsupported as a contributing factor to them leaving the field. This study serves to exemplify that systemic issues that have been observed in other STEM fields exist in the ocean science field as well. The study uses a novel framework to present and analyze trends in the experiences of BIPOC ocean scientists around the world. Supplemental data for this article can be acceessed here.
BIPOC在海洋科学中的声音:影响职业保留的因素的定性探索
摘要本研究的目的是了解影响黑人、土著或有色人种(BIPOC)科学家招募和保留的因素。采用非概率滚雪球抽样方法,招募了47名目前或曾经在海洋科学领域工作的BIPOC参与者参加半结构化访谈,并使用Astin的投入-环境-产出框架和社会认知职业理论对访谈进行了分析。一些干预措施已经到位,以解决导致某些群体被排除在外的系统性问题,包括以bipoc为重点的项目、研究经历和指导,这些干预措施被认为对归属感(在群体中被接受的感觉)、科学认同(将自己归类为“科学人”)和自我效能感(对自己成功能力的信念)的认知个人结果有积极影响。包括歧视、缺乏盟友关系和消极的研究或指导经历在内的几个因素被确定为大大降低这些认知-个人结果的因素。此外,所有三位离开海洋科学领域的受访者都提到了他们感到不受支持的研究经历,这是他们离开该领域的一个因素。该研究表明,在其他STEM领域观察到的系统性问题也存在于海洋科学领域。这项研究使用了一个新的框架来呈现和分析世界各地BIPOC海洋科学家的经验趋势。本文的补充数据可以在这里访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geoscience Education
Journal of Geoscience Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geoscience Education (JGE) is a peer-reviewed publication for geoscience education research, and serves as an international forum for research concerning the pedagogy, assessment, and philosophy of teaching and learning about the geosciences and related domains. JGE is a publication of the National Association of Geoscience Teachers, a non-profit, member-driven organization that supports a diverse, inclusive, and thriving community of educators and education researchers to improve teaching and learning about the Earth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信