Assessment of hydraulic conductivity and soil quality of similar lithology under contrasting landuse and land cover in humid tropical Nigeria

IF 0.4 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE
E. I. Chidozie, Irokwe Frida Ifeanyi, Okafor Maduabuchi Johnbosco, Irondi Aaron Onyekachi, C. Anthony, Okeke Obinna, Njoku Ugochi Gift, Dibofori George, Agbugba Stanly Emeka, T. Raza, M. Glory
{"title":"Assessment of hydraulic conductivity and soil quality of similar lithology under contrasting landuse and land cover in humid tropical Nigeria","authors":"E. I. Chidozie, Irokwe Frida Ifeanyi, Okafor Maduabuchi Johnbosco, Irondi Aaron Onyekachi, C. Anthony, Okeke Obinna, Njoku Ugochi Gift, Dibofori George, Agbugba Stanly Emeka, T. Raza, M. Glory","doi":"10.25252/SE/19/61419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study assessed hydraulic conductivity and soil quality of some tropical soils of Nigeria. Field studies were carried out in eight Local Government Areas of Imo State with contrasting land use and similar lithology (coastal plain sands). These included Owerri west (Bare fallow) Mbaitoli (Industrial Area), Owerri Municipal (Residential Area), Ohaji/Egbema (Cassava Cultivated), Ikeduru (Oil Palm Plantation), Ngor-Okpala (Continuous Cultivated), Aboh–Mbaise (Excavated Site) and Owerri North (Bush Fallow/Control). Top soil samples of 0-20cm were collected from each land use type. Soil sample was also collected in fallow plot as a tool for comparison. Soil samples were air dried and sieved for standard laboratory analysis. Data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. Results showed nutrient depletion in soils of all land uses compared to the fallow plot. Sand content (812.3g/kg) dominated the texture of all soils studied. All soils studied had slightly acidic soil reaction with mean value of 4.73. With regard to hydraulic conductivity, following the land degradation index (LDI,) high land degradation was observed in the excavated site (-92.9), Residential Area (-87.3) and Industrial Area (-84.1) with corresponding higher bulk densities and lower soil porosity compared to other soils .Generally, soils of the excavated site were highly degraded, followed by the residential area, industrial area, continuous cultivated area, cassava cultivated plot, oil palm plantaion and bare fallow plot, respectively. Dense population, blank utilization of lands, soil mismanagement, deforestation, high temperature and rainfall, intensive cultivation were observed to have aided the decline of soil quality. Adoption of night soil technology as well as other organic and climate smart agricultural practices should be encouraged.","PeriodicalId":21762,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25252/SE/19/61419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The study assessed hydraulic conductivity and soil quality of some tropical soils of Nigeria. Field studies were carried out in eight Local Government Areas of Imo State with contrasting land use and similar lithology (coastal plain sands). These included Owerri west (Bare fallow) Mbaitoli (Industrial Area), Owerri Municipal (Residential Area), Ohaji/Egbema (Cassava Cultivated), Ikeduru (Oil Palm Plantation), Ngor-Okpala (Continuous Cultivated), Aboh–Mbaise (Excavated Site) and Owerri North (Bush Fallow/Control). Top soil samples of 0-20cm were collected from each land use type. Soil sample was also collected in fallow plot as a tool for comparison. Soil samples were air dried and sieved for standard laboratory analysis. Data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. Results showed nutrient depletion in soils of all land uses compared to the fallow plot. Sand content (812.3g/kg) dominated the texture of all soils studied. All soils studied had slightly acidic soil reaction with mean value of 4.73. With regard to hydraulic conductivity, following the land degradation index (LDI,) high land degradation was observed in the excavated site (-92.9), Residential Area (-87.3) and Industrial Area (-84.1) with corresponding higher bulk densities and lower soil porosity compared to other soils .Generally, soils of the excavated site were highly degraded, followed by the residential area, industrial area, continuous cultivated area, cassava cultivated plot, oil palm plantaion and bare fallow plot, respectively. Dense population, blank utilization of lands, soil mismanagement, deforestation, high temperature and rainfall, intensive cultivation were observed to have aided the decline of soil quality. Adoption of night soil technology as well as other organic and climate smart agricultural practices should be encouraged.
尼日利亚热带潮湿地区土地利用和土地覆盖对比下相似岩性的导水性和土壤质量评估
本研究评估了尼日利亚一些热带土壤的水力传导性和土壤质量。在伊莫州的八个地方政府地区进行了实地研究,对比了土地使用情况和类似的岩性(沿海平原砂)。其中包括奥韦里西部(荒地)、姆拜托里(工业区)、奥韦里市区(住宅区)、Ohaji/Egbema(木薯种植)、Ikeduru(油棕种植园)、ngoro - okpala(连续种植)、Aboh-Mbaise(挖掘遗址)和奥韦里北部(丛林休耕/控制)。每个土地利用类型采集0 ~ 20cm的表层土壤样品。还在休耕地采集土壤样品作为比较工具。土壤样品被风干和筛选用于标准的实验室分析。得到的数据进行统计分析。结果表明,与休耕地相比,不同土地利用方式的土壤养分均出现了耗竭现象。砂含量(812.3g/kg)在所有土壤的质地中占主导地位。所有土壤均发生微酸性土壤反应,平均值为4.73。在土壤导电性方面,根据土地退化指数(LDI),开挖场地(-92.9)、居住区(-87.3)和工业区(-84.1)的土地退化程度较高,容重相对较高,土壤孔隙度相对较低。总体而言,开挖场地土壤退化程度较高,其次是居住区、工业区、连作区、cassava种植区、油棕种植区和光复休闲区;分别。密集的人口、土地的空白利用、土壤管理不善、森林砍伐、高温和降雨、集约化耕作等都是导致土壤质量下降的原因。应鼓励采用夜间土壤技术以及其他有机和气候智能型农业做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Environment
Soil & Environment SOIL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信