Corectarea greșelilor și oferirea de feedback în predarea online a limbii române ca limbă străină

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Raluca Levonian
{"title":"Corectarea greșelilor și oferirea de feedback în predarea online a limbii române ca limbă străină","authors":"Raluca Levonian","doi":"10.60133/pj.2023.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses how written corrective feedback was provided during the online teaching of Romanian as a foreign language at an Italian university in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. The retrospective analysis focuses on the most common types of mistakes identified in the students’ homework and on the strategies applied by the author as the lecturer for Romanian language in the revision of the homework. The first part of the research aimed to identify and classify the errors appearing in the students’ texts, investigating the possible causes of the errors. The findings revealed that grammar errors were made more frequently by the students at beginner level, while lexical errors were made by students at an intermediate or advanced level of knowledge. Results also show that the teacher tended to use various types of corrective feedback, depending on the error type that was identified. The teacher’s feedback took different forms, ranging from simple error correction to extended comments and the proposal of alternative solutions. Moreover, the corrective feedback was offered directly for beginner students, while the corrections tended to be hedged when addressing advanced students, in order to avoid their discouragement. The students found the teacher’s feedback useful and even used the homework as a means to signal their difficulties with learning and ask for help. These results contradict previous research claiming that effective feedback involved direct indications using the imperative.","PeriodicalId":41055,"journal":{"name":"Philologica Jassyensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philologica Jassyensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60133/pj.2023.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses how written corrective feedback was provided during the online teaching of Romanian as a foreign language at an Italian university in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. The retrospective analysis focuses on the most common types of mistakes identified in the students’ homework and on the strategies applied by the author as the lecturer for Romanian language in the revision of the homework. The first part of the research aimed to identify and classify the errors appearing in the students’ texts, investigating the possible causes of the errors. The findings revealed that grammar errors were made more frequently by the students at beginner level, while lexical errors were made by students at an intermediate or advanced level of knowledge. Results also show that the teacher tended to use various types of corrective feedback, depending on the error type that was identified. The teacher’s feedback took different forms, ranging from simple error correction to extended comments and the proposal of alternative solutions. Moreover, the corrective feedback was offered directly for beginner students, while the corrections tended to be hedged when addressing advanced students, in order to avoid their discouragement. The students found the teacher’s feedback useful and even used the homework as a means to signal their difficulties with learning and ask for help. These results contradict previous research claiming that effective feedback involved direct indications using the imperative.
对外罗马尼亚语在线教学中的纠错与反馈
本文分析了在冠状病毒大流行的背景下,意大利一所大学在对外罗马尼亚语在线教学过程中如何提供书面纠正反馈。回顾性分析的重点是学生家庭作业中发现的最常见的错误类型,以及作者作为罗马尼亚语讲师在家庭作业修改中使用的策略。研究的第一部分旨在识别和分类学生课文中出现的错误,调查错误的可能原因。研究结果表明,初级水平的学生更容易犯语法错误,而中级或高级知识水平的学生则更容易犯词汇错误。结果还表明,教师倾向于使用各种类型的纠正反馈,这取决于所识别的错误类型。老师的反馈采取了不同的形式,从简单的纠错到延伸的评论和提出替代解决方案。此外,纠正性反馈是直接为初学者提供的,而在针对高级学生时,往往会对纠正进行对冲,以避免他们气馁。学生们发现老师的反馈很有用,甚至把家庭作业作为表示学习困难和寻求帮助的手段。这些结果与之前的研究相矛盾,之前的研究声称有效的反馈涉及使用命令的直接指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philologica Jassyensia
Philologica Jassyensia LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书