Antimicrobial prescription pattern in the Deido health district, Douala, Cameroon

Njumkeng Charles, Amin Elvis T, Nti Mvilongo Prudence Tatiana, Zofou Denis, KT Akoachere Jane Francis, Njukeng Patrick A
{"title":"Antimicrobial prescription pattern in the Deido health district, Douala, Cameroon","authors":"Njumkeng Charles, Amin Elvis T, Nti Mvilongo Prudence Tatiana, Zofou Denis, KT Akoachere Jane Francis, Njukeng Patrick A","doi":"10.17352/2455-5479.000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions are among the highest contributing factors to Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). Most low and middle-income (LMICS) countries with high AMR burdens like Cameroon, seldom document information on prescription patterns, whereas this information is crucial in addressing inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions. This study was therefore designed to elucidate antimicrobial prescription patterns in order to tailor interventions to mitigate AMR in Cameroon. The study adopted a multicentre cross-sectional design. Information on antimicrobial prescriptions was collected from four hospitals within the Deido Health District, between October 2019 and March 2020. Of the 1398 participants that were enrolled in the study, the most presented age group were participants aged 15-45 years 913(65.3%) and prescriptions were higher amongst females (923,53.6%). The highest number of antimicrobial prescriptions was made in the outpatient department 592(42.3%) followed by the pediatric unit, 344(24.6%). Most of the prescriptions were for patients with respiratory tract infections 436 (31.2%), followed by those with digestive tract infections 248 (17.7%). The most frequently prescribed class of drugs were the Penicillins 690 (40.3%, 37.8 – 42.6), with Amoxicillin clavulanic acid accounting for 27.8% of the overall prescriptions followed by Cephalosporins 392 (22.7, 20.6 – 24.7), with Ceftriaxone being the most prescribed in the class (13.3%). The need for prescription was mainly determined by clinical judgement (61.1%), while only 9.5% of prescriptions were based on antimicrobial sensitivity test. In the struggle to mitigate AMR, there is a great need to exploit data on prescription patterns and develop stewardship programs in order to optimise antimicrobial use in Cameroon. We emphasize in this communication the potential benefits and outcomes of foresight thinking, such as improved resilience, better resource allocation, and effective response strategies.","PeriodicalId":87221,"journal":{"name":"Archives of community medicine and public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of community medicine and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5479.000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions are among the highest contributing factors to Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). Most low and middle-income (LMICS) countries with high AMR burdens like Cameroon, seldom document information on prescription patterns, whereas this information is crucial in addressing inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions. This study was therefore designed to elucidate antimicrobial prescription patterns in order to tailor interventions to mitigate AMR in Cameroon. The study adopted a multicentre cross-sectional design. Information on antimicrobial prescriptions was collected from four hospitals within the Deido Health District, between October 2019 and March 2020. Of the 1398 participants that were enrolled in the study, the most presented age group were participants aged 15-45 years 913(65.3%) and prescriptions were higher amongst females (923,53.6%). The highest number of antimicrobial prescriptions was made in the outpatient department 592(42.3%) followed by the pediatric unit, 344(24.6%). Most of the prescriptions were for patients with respiratory tract infections 436 (31.2%), followed by those with digestive tract infections 248 (17.7%). The most frequently prescribed class of drugs were the Penicillins 690 (40.3%, 37.8 – 42.6), with Amoxicillin clavulanic acid accounting for 27.8% of the overall prescriptions followed by Cephalosporins 392 (22.7, 20.6 – 24.7), with Ceftriaxone being the most prescribed in the class (13.3%). The need for prescription was mainly determined by clinical judgement (61.1%), while only 9.5% of prescriptions were based on antimicrobial sensitivity test. In the struggle to mitigate AMR, there is a great need to exploit data on prescription patterns and develop stewardship programs in order to optimise antimicrobial use in Cameroon. We emphasize in this communication the potential benefits and outcomes of foresight thinking, such as improved resilience, better resource allocation, and effective response strategies.
喀麦隆杜阿拉Deido卫生区的抗菌药物处方模式
不适当的抗菌药物处方是导致抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)的最高因素之一。大多数AMR负担较高的中低收入国家(如喀麦隆)很少记录有关处方模式的信息,而这些信息对于解决不适当的抗菌处方至关重要。因此,本研究旨在阐明抗微生物处方模式,以调整干预措施,缓解喀麦隆的AMR。该研究采用了多中心横断面设计。2019年10月至2020年3月期间,从代多卫生区的四家医院收集了抗菌药物处方信息。在1398名参与研究的参与者中,出现最多的年龄组是15-45岁的参与者913人(65.3%),女性的处方数量更高(923,53.6%)。抗菌药物处方数量最多的是门诊592人(42.3%),其次是儿科,344(24.6%)。大多数处方是针对呼吸道感染患者的436(31.2%),其次是消化道感染患者的248(17.7%)。最常见的处方类别是青霉素690(40.3%,37.8-42.6),阿莫西林-克拉维酸占总处方的27.8%,其次是头孢菌素392(22.7,20.6-24.7),处方需求主要由临床判断决定(61.1%),而只有9.5%的处方是基于抗菌药物敏感性测试。在缓解AMR的斗争中,非常需要利用处方模式的数据并制定管理计划,以优化喀麦隆的抗菌药物使用。我们在此次沟通中强调了前瞻性思维的潜在好处和结果,如提高韧性、更好的资源分配和有效的应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信