A Supportive-Educative Intervention For Tuberculosis Patients: Integrated Self-Care And Family-Centered Nursing

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

Russian Open Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-03-20 DOI:10.15275/rusomj.2022.0106

Nur Melizza, R. Hargono, Makhfudli

{"title":"A Supportive-Educative Intervention For Tuberculosis Patients: Integrated Self-Care And Family-Centered Nursing","authors":"Nur Melizza, R. Hargono, Makhfudli","doi":"10.15275/rusomj.2022.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim — This study aims to evaluate the effect of supportive educative system intervention on Tuberculosis (TB) patient’s family support. Material and Methods — This study was a quantitative study with a quasi-experimental design, conducted in the Public Health Center (PHC) of Kedungkandang and Ciptomulyo with 48 respondents. The respondents were divided into the control group with standard PHC intervention (n=24) and the treatment group with standard PHC intervention added with the supportive educative system (n=24). The data were analyzed by paired t-test and independent t-test. Results — There was a significant difference in family support between treatment and control. The results indicated that a supportive educative system significantly increases family support (p=0.003). Interestingly, PHC standard intervention showed improvement in family support (68.46±73.58) than supportive educative system (74.29±75.83). Supportive educative system interventions were less effective than standard PHC interventions. It could be influenced by sample characteristics, time of the study, control of variables, and other factors. Conclusion — Supportive educative interventions are effective in improving family support but are no better than standard PHC interventions.","PeriodicalId":21426,"journal":{"name":"Russian Open Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Open Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15275/rusomj.2022.0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim — This study aims to evaluate the effect of supportive educative system intervention on Tuberculosis (TB) patient’s family support. Material and Methods — This study was a quantitative study with a quasi-experimental design, conducted in the Public Health Center (PHC) of Kedungkandang and Ciptomulyo with 48 respondents. The respondents were divided into the control group with standard PHC intervention (n=24) and the treatment group with standard PHC intervention added with the supportive educative system (n=24). The data were analyzed by paired t-test and independent t-test. Results — There was a significant difference in family support between treatment and control. The results indicated that a supportive educative system significantly increases family support (p=0.003). Interestingly, PHC standard intervention showed improvement in family support (68.46±73.58) than supportive educative system (74.29±75.83). Supportive educative system interventions were less effective than standard PHC interventions. It could be influenced by sample characteristics, time of the study, control of variables, and other factors. Conclusion — Supportive educative interventions are effective in improving family support but are no better than standard PHC interventions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

结核病患者的支持教育干预:自我照顾与以家庭为中心的综合护理

目的:本研究旨在评估支持教育系统干预对结核病患者家庭支持的影响。▽材料和方法=本研究是在Kedungkandang和Ciptomulyo的公共卫生中心(PHC)对48名调查对象进行的准实验设计的定量研究。将被调查者分为对照组(24例)和治疗组(24例)，对照组采用标准PHC干预，治疗组采用标准PHC干预加支持教育系统。采用配对t检验和独立t检验对数据进行分析。结果:治疗组和对照组在家庭支持方面有显著差异。结果显示，支持性教育系统显著增加家庭支持(p=0.003)。有趣的是，PHC标准干预在家庭支持(68.46±73.58)方面优于支持性教育系统(74.29±75.83)。支持性教育系统干预不如标准初级保健干预有效。它可能受到样本特征、研究时间、变量控制和其他因素的影响。结论:支持性教育干预在改善家庭支持方面是有效的，但并不比标准的初级保健干预更好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Russian Open Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Russian Open Medical Journal (RusOMJ) (ISSN 2304-3415) is an international peer reviewed open access e-journal. The website is updated quarterly with the RusOMJ’s latest original research, clinical studies, case reports, reviews, news, and comment articles. This Journal devoted to all field of medicine. All the RusOMJ’s articles are published in full on www.romj.org with open access and no limits on word counts. Our mission is to lead the debate on health and to engage, inform, and stimulate doctors, researchers, and other health professionals in ways that will improve outcomes for patients. The RusOMJ team is based mainly in Saratov (Russia), although we also have editors elsewhere in Russian and in other countries.