Diagnostic accuracy of Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in hemophilic joint involvement

C.M. Baracaldo Silva, I. Elía, F. Querol-Fuentes, J.J. Carrasco, P. Nogués-Meléndez, C. Ramírez-Fuentes, L. Martí-Bonmatí
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in hemophilic joint involvement","authors":"C.M. Baracaldo Silva, I. Elía, F. Querol-Fuentes, J.J. Carrasco, P. Nogués-Meléndez, C. Ramírez-Fuentes, L. Martí-Bonmatí","doi":"10.32440/ar.2022.139.02.org01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: In hemophiliac patients, recurrent intra-articular bleeding leads to progressive arthropathy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold-standard technique for joint assessment. The development of ultrasound protocols and standardized scales such as “Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound” (HEAD-US) and “Point-of-care Ultrasonography” (POC-US) allow patient monitoring. Our main objective is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the early detection of hemophilic arthropathy, with MRI as the gold standard. The interobserver variability in the ultrasound and MRI scales, the association between the POC-US and HEAD-US protocol, and the ability of ultrasound to detect haemosiderotic remnants will also be established.\nPatients and Methods: 45 hemophiliac patients were included. 180 joints (knees and ankles) were evaluated with MRI (Denver scale) and Ultrasound (HEAD-US and POC-US scale).\nResults: There is a high and statistically significant association between the ultrasound and MRI scales. Only for the ankle effusion variable the association was medium. The specificity of HEAD-US was ≥90% in both joints. Sensitivity in the knee did not exceed 82% in any assessed aspect, being high in the ankle for the cartilage and bone alterations (97%) but low for effusions (55%). In general, the predictive values ​​were high, with the exception of the negative predictive value of joint leak in knee and ankle (close to 70%). Ultrasound did not detect haemosiderotic remnants in any case. Statistically significant interobserver agreement was obtained for HEAD-US and Denver-MRI assessment. The level of association between the HEAD-US scale and the POC-US protocol was medium.\nConclusions: Ultrasound is a technique with high diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility to detect and quantify the early signs of hemophilic arthropathy. Ultrasound is insensitive to detect haemosiderin in synovial hypertrophy.","PeriodicalId":75487,"journal":{"name":"Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32440/ar.2022.139.02.org01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: In hemophiliac patients, recurrent intra-articular bleeding leads to progressive arthropathy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold-standard technique for joint assessment. The development of ultrasound protocols and standardized scales such as “Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound” (HEAD-US) and “Point-of-care Ultrasonography” (POC-US) allow patient monitoring. Our main objective is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the early detection of hemophilic arthropathy, with MRI as the gold standard. The interobserver variability in the ultrasound and MRI scales, the association between the POC-US and HEAD-US protocol, and the ability of ultrasound to detect haemosiderotic remnants will also be established. Patients and Methods: 45 hemophiliac patients were included. 180 joints (knees and ankles) were evaluated with MRI (Denver scale) and Ultrasound (HEAD-US and POC-US scale). Results: There is a high and statistically significant association between the ultrasound and MRI scales. Only for the ankle effusion variable the association was medium. The specificity of HEAD-US was ≥90% in both joints. Sensitivity in the knee did not exceed 82% in any assessed aspect, being high in the ankle for the cartilage and bone alterations (97%) but low for effusions (55%). In general, the predictive values ​​were high, with the exception of the negative predictive value of joint leak in knee and ankle (close to 70%). Ultrasound did not detect haemosiderotic remnants in any case. Statistically significant interobserver agreement was obtained for HEAD-US and Denver-MRI assessment. The level of association between the HEAD-US scale and the POC-US protocol was medium. Conclusions: Ultrasound is a technique with high diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility to detect and quantify the early signs of hemophilic arthropathy. Ultrasound is insensitive to detect haemosiderin in synovial hypertrophy.
超声与磁共振成像对血友病关节受累的诊断准确性
背景和目的:在血友病患者中,复发性关节内出血会导致进行性关节病。磁共振成像(MRI)是关节评估的金标准技术。超声方案和标准化量表的开发,如“用超声检测血友病早期关节病”(HEAD-US)和“护理点超声检查”(POC-US),允许对患者进行监测。我们的主要目标是以MRI为金标准,建立超声在早期检测血友病关节病中的诊断准确性。还将确定超声和MRI量表的观察者间变异性、POC-US和HEAD-US方案之间的关联以及超声检测含铁血黄素残留的能力。患者和方法:纳入45例血友病患者。用MRI(Denver量表)和超声(HEAD-US和POC-US量表)对180个关节(膝盖和脚踝)进行了评估。只有踝关节积液变量的相关性为中等。HEAD-US在两个关节中的特异性均≥90%。在任何评估方面,膝盖的敏感性都不超过82%,脚踝软骨和骨骼变化的敏感性较高(97%),但渗出的敏感性较低(55%)。一般来说,预测值​​除了膝关节和踝关节渗漏的阴性预测值(接近70%)外。超声波在任何情况下都没有检测到含铁血黄素残留。HEAD-US和Denver MRI评估获得了具有统计学意义的观察者间一致性。HEAD-US量表和POC-US协议之间的关联程度为中等。结论:超声是一种诊断血友病关节病早期体征的高准确性和可重复性技术。超声对检测滑膜肥大中的含铁血黄素不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信