Is critical thinking a future skill for business success: science mapping and literature review

IF 1.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Małgorzata Skrzek-Lubasińska, Radosław Malik
{"title":"Is critical thinking a future skill for business success: science mapping and literature review","authors":"Małgorzata Skrzek-Lubasińska, Radosław Malik","doi":"10.1108/cemj-09-2021-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article aims to review critical thinking (CT) as a future skill in business.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed two research methods: science mapping analysis based on bibliometric keyword co-occurrence data and systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines. The application of two distinctive research methods meant that we could obtain a broad picture thematic overview as well as a detailed, fine-grained insight into the content of CT business research.FindingsResearch in CT in business studies is dominated by themes related to education, university and learning that far outweigh CT business application, which focuses on three research axes. These are specific business functions (e.g. accounting, marketing, human resources and identifying business opportunities), certain skills used in business (e.g. decision-making and creativity) and other business-related topics (including ethics, stakeholder relations and individual employee performance).Practical implicationsThe article identifies new research gaps related to the link between CT and business performance, a firm’s ability to innovate and company characteristics. Moreover, the article highlights that CT positively influences business decision-making under the influence of cognitive biases and heuristics.Originality/valueThe article provides the first literature review on CT in business research. It uses a novel method of science mapping analysis to show unbiased algorithmic-based insight into the structure of the research, followed by a systematic literature review.","PeriodicalId":40276,"journal":{"name":"Central European Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cemj-09-2021-0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to review critical thinking (CT) as a future skill in business.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed two research methods: science mapping analysis based on bibliometric keyword co-occurrence data and systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines. The application of two distinctive research methods meant that we could obtain a broad picture thematic overview as well as a detailed, fine-grained insight into the content of CT business research.FindingsResearch in CT in business studies is dominated by themes related to education, university and learning that far outweigh CT business application, which focuses on three research axes. These are specific business functions (e.g. accounting, marketing, human resources and identifying business opportunities), certain skills used in business (e.g. decision-making and creativity) and other business-related topics (including ethics, stakeholder relations and individual employee performance).Practical implicationsThe article identifies new research gaps related to the link between CT and business performance, a firm’s ability to innovate and company characteristics. Moreover, the article highlights that CT positively influences business decision-making under the influence of cognitive biases and heuristics.Originality/valueThe article provides the first literature review on CT in business research. It uses a novel method of science mapping analysis to show unbiased algorithmic-based insight into the structure of the research, followed by a systematic literature review.
批判性思维是商业成功的未来技能吗:科学制图和文献综述
目的本文旨在回顾批判性思维(CT)作为一种未来的商业技能。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用了两种研究方法:基于文献计量学关键词共现数据的科学图谱分析和遵循PRISMA指南的系统文献综述。两种独特研究方法的应用意味着我们可以获得全面的主题概述,以及对CT商业研究内容的详细、精细的见解。发现CT在商业研究中的研究主要是与教育、大学和学习相关的主题,远远超过CT商业应用,它专注于三个研究轴。这些是具体的业务职能(如会计、营销、人力资源和识别商机)、业务中使用的某些技能(如决策和创造力)以及其他与业务相关的主题(包括道德、利益相关者关系和员工个人绩效)。实践含义本文指出了CT与企业绩效、企业创新能力和公司特征之间联系的新研究空白。此外,文章强调CT在认知偏见和启发式的影响下对商业决策产生了积极影响。原创性/价值本文提供了商业研究中CT的第一篇文献综述。它使用了一种新颖的科学映射分析方法,以显示对研究结构的无偏见的基于算法的见解,然后进行了系统的文献综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信