Learning Global Citizenship Skills in a Democratic Setting: An Analysis of the Efficacy of a Moral Development Method Applied in China

K. Lei, Annie Rubienska, Yang Shao-gang, Zheng Tie, Qiu Ying
{"title":"Learning Global Citizenship Skills in a Democratic Setting: An Analysis of the Efficacy of a Moral Development Method Applied in China","authors":"K. Lei, Annie Rubienska, Yang Shao-gang, Zheng Tie, Qiu Ying","doi":"10.14746/FPED.2014.3.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To reduce the limitations of current measures of morality, and to focus on an effective approach to moral development among university students, the researchers adopted the Konstanz Method of Dilemma Discussion, to probe whether this type of method can also be applied among Chinese students, regarding the development of moral competence. ‘Moral Competence’, also known as ‘moral-democratic’ competence, is a concept developed by German psychologist, Professor Georg Lind. It is built upon the theories of Kohlberg, yet focuses on moral judgment and democratic decision-making competence. Lind designed a scale based on his dual-aspect theory, and suggested a follow-up method for building up moral competence. KMDD has been used in Germany and other countries for many years and has achieved positive results when applied. The initial application of this type of method in China started in 2012. After more than two years’ of planning and research, we used this method with different groups of Chinese | 37 | Learning Global Citizenship Skills in a Democratic Setting university students and tested its efficacy. Participants were set as the control and experiment groups. After analysing the preand-post-test data from all the participants, the result shows that the intervention effect with experiment groups was very significant with a noticeable Absolute Effect Size of C-score, while the competence score of control group regressed sharply due to reasons to be identified. Data from the experiment were analysed and intervention results were compared, to examine the efficacy of the method and to evaluate further application and research of KMDD in China.","PeriodicalId":52700,"journal":{"name":"Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/FPED.2014.3.2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To reduce the limitations of current measures of morality, and to focus on an effective approach to moral development among university students, the researchers adopted the Konstanz Method of Dilemma Discussion, to probe whether this type of method can also be applied among Chinese students, regarding the development of moral competence. ‘Moral Competence’, also known as ‘moral-democratic’ competence, is a concept developed by German psychologist, Professor Georg Lind. It is built upon the theories of Kohlberg, yet focuses on moral judgment and democratic decision-making competence. Lind designed a scale based on his dual-aspect theory, and suggested a follow-up method for building up moral competence. KMDD has been used in Germany and other countries for many years and has achieved positive results when applied. The initial application of this type of method in China started in 2012. After more than two years’ of planning and research, we used this method with different groups of Chinese | 37 | Learning Global Citizenship Skills in a Democratic Setting university students and tested its efficacy. Participants were set as the control and experiment groups. After analysing the preand-post-test data from all the participants, the result shows that the intervention effect with experiment groups was very significant with a noticeable Absolute Effect Size of C-score, while the competence score of control group regressed sharply due to reasons to be identified. Data from the experiment were analysed and intervention results were compared, to examine the efficacy of the method and to evaluate further application and research of KMDD in China.
在民主环境中学习全球公民技能:一种适用于中国的道德发展方法的有效性分析
为了减少现有道德衡量标准的局限性,并着眼于寻找一条有效的大学生道德发展途径,研究人员采用康斯坦茨困境讨论法,探讨这种方法是否也适用于中国学生的道德能力发展。“道德能力”,也被称为“道德-民主”能力,是德国心理学家乔治·林德教授提出的一个概念。它建立在Kohlberg的理论基础上,但侧重于道德判断和民主决策能力。林德根据他的双重性理论设计了一个量表,并提出了一种道德能力建设的跟踪方法。KMDD已在德国等国家应用多年,并取得了积极的效果。这种方法在中国的首次应用始于2012年。经过两年多的计划和研究,我们将这种方法应用于不同群体的中国bbbb37 b|在民主环境下学习全球公民技能的大学生,并测试了其有效性。参与者分为对照组和实验组。通过对所有被试的测试前后数据进行分析,结果显示实验组的干预效果非常显著,c得分的绝对效应值显著,而对照组的能力得分由于原因不明而急剧回归。对试验数据进行分析,并对干预结果进行比较,以检验该方法的有效性,并对KMDD在中国的进一步应用和研究进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信