“I Hate That Food Lion”: Grocery Shopping, Racial Capitalism, and Everyday Disinvestment

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Sarah Mayorga, M. Underhill, Lauren Crosser
{"title":"“I Hate That Food Lion”: Grocery Shopping, Racial Capitalism, and Everyday Disinvestment","authors":"Sarah Mayorga, M. Underhill, Lauren Crosser","doi":"10.1177/15356841221091811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using interview data from three mixed-income neighborhoods—one predominantly white and two multiracial neighborhoods—we find that an overwhelming majority of white, middle-class respondents did not shop in their local grocery store (n = 68). To explain this phenomenon, we propose a concept of everyday disinvestment to capture the interplay between individual-level decision-making and structural-level disinvestment under racial capitalism. We identify three practices of everyday disinvestment—avoidance, distancing, and selective engagement—as well as the rationalizations residents present for their behaviors. We argue racial capitalist ideologies of antiblackness and consumption as freedom are foundational to residents’ justifications of disinvestment from grocery stores in mixed-income communities. Everyday disinvestment not only expands our understanding of disinvestment as a mechanism of racial capitalism, but it deepens our understanding of food apartheid as a relational process.","PeriodicalId":47486,"journal":{"name":"City & Community","volume":"21 1","pages":"238 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City & Community","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841221091811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Using interview data from three mixed-income neighborhoods—one predominantly white and two multiracial neighborhoods—we find that an overwhelming majority of white, middle-class respondents did not shop in their local grocery store (n = 68). To explain this phenomenon, we propose a concept of everyday disinvestment to capture the interplay between individual-level decision-making and structural-level disinvestment under racial capitalism. We identify three practices of everyday disinvestment—avoidance, distancing, and selective engagement—as well as the rationalizations residents present for their behaviors. We argue racial capitalist ideologies of antiblackness and consumption as freedom are foundational to residents’ justifications of disinvestment from grocery stores in mixed-income communities. Everyday disinvestment not only expands our understanding of disinvestment as a mechanism of racial capitalism, but it deepens our understanding of food apartheid as a relational process.
“我讨厌那只食物狮子”:杂货店购物、种族资本主义和日常的撤资
使用三个混合收入社区的访谈数据——一个以白人为主,两个多种族社区——我们发现绝大多数白人中产阶级受访者不在当地的杂货店购物(n = 68)。为了解释这一现象,我们提出了一个日常撤资的概念,以捕捉种族资本主义下个人层面决策和结构层面撤资之间的相互作用。我们确定了日常撤除投资的三种做法——回避、保持距离和选择性参与——以及居民为他们的行为所呈现的合理化。我们认为,反黑人和消费自由的种族资本主义意识形态是居民从混合收入社区的杂货店撤资的理由的基础。日常的撤资不仅扩大了我们对撤资作为种族资本主义机制的理解,而且加深了我们对食品种族隔离作为一个关系过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
City & Community
City & Community Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信