Flying-Gallop and Foreshortening: Winner Circle

IF 1.5 4区心理学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Empirical Studies of the Arts Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/0276237419868959

J. Kennedy, S. Mastandrea, Igor Juricevic, Marta Wnuczko

引用次数: 0

Abstract

As Winner (1982) argued, we “read” a lot in to pictures, aptly via metaphor—which applies to unreal stretch in flying-gallop—but inaccurately with perspective—we underestimate compression of the azimuth.

查看原文本刊更多论文

飞驰与前瞻：赢家圈

正如温纳(1982)所言，我们通过隐喻恰当地“解读”了很多图片——这适用于飞跑中的虚幻伸展——但不准确地运用了透视——我们低估了方位角的压缩。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Empirical Studies of the Arts Multiple-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Empirical Studies of the Arts (ART) aims to be an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical and empirical studies of aesthetics, creativity, and all of the arts. It spans anthropological, psychological, neuroscientific, semiotic, and sociological studies of the creation, perception, and appreciation of literary, musical, visual and other art forms. Whether you are an active researcher or an interested bystander, Empirical Studies of the Arts keeps you up to date on the latest trends in scientific studies of the arts.