Joint or decoupled optimization: Multi-UAV path planning for search and rescue

IF 5.4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ad Hoc Networks Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.103018
Evşen Yanmaz
{"title":"Joint or decoupled optimization: Multi-UAV path planning for search and rescue","authors":"Evşen Yanmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.103018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In this paper, we focus on path planning<span> of drone teams deployed for search and rescue missions. The goal of the mission is to detect a target, inform the rescue personnel at the ground base station (BS), and form a communication relay chain between the target and the BS as fast as possible. Such missions where both detection and connectivity requirements need to be met can be planned by formulating (i) a </span></span>single objective optimization problem<span> with connectivity constraints; (ii) a multi-objective optimization problem<span> where mission and connectivity needs are jointly optimized or (iii) mission and connectivity tasks are optimized decoupled from each other. Both joint and decoupled approaches have merit in terms of mission times, connectivity, cost and/or implementation. In this paper, we compare selected joint and decoupled multi-drone path planning approaches from mission and connectivity perspectives. We illustrate the trade-off between performance metrics from both viewpoints and show that depending on the available resources (e.g., number of drones) and the search area most suitable planner can change. We then propose a hybrid planner that utilizes joint optimization for the search drones and decoupled optimization for the relay drones. Hence, the proposed scheme has a flexibility due to allowing different search path planners to be used and a connectivity-wise better pre-mission plan. Our analysis shows that the hybrid scheme results in a better connectivity and total mission time if there are enough drones, but for very small number of search drones, hybrid scheme leads to a higher mission time than the joint scheme due to reservation of drones for relaying purposes.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55555,"journal":{"name":"Ad Hoc Networks","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103018"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ad Hoc Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870522001901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on path planning of drone teams deployed for search and rescue missions. The goal of the mission is to detect a target, inform the rescue personnel at the ground base station (BS), and form a communication relay chain between the target and the BS as fast as possible. Such missions where both detection and connectivity requirements need to be met can be planned by formulating (i) a single objective optimization problem with connectivity constraints; (ii) a multi-objective optimization problem where mission and connectivity needs are jointly optimized or (iii) mission and connectivity tasks are optimized decoupled from each other. Both joint and decoupled approaches have merit in terms of mission times, connectivity, cost and/or implementation. In this paper, we compare selected joint and decoupled multi-drone path planning approaches from mission and connectivity perspectives. We illustrate the trade-off between performance metrics from both viewpoints and show that depending on the available resources (e.g., number of drones) and the search area most suitable planner can change. We then propose a hybrid planner that utilizes joint optimization for the search drones and decoupled optimization for the relay drones. Hence, the proposed scheme has a flexibility due to allowing different search path planners to be used and a connectivity-wise better pre-mission plan. Our analysis shows that the hybrid scheme results in a better connectivity and total mission time if there are enough drones, but for very small number of search drones, hybrid scheme leads to a higher mission time than the joint scheme due to reservation of drones for relaying purposes.

联合或解耦优化:用于搜索和救援的多无人机路径规划
本文主要研究用于搜救任务的无人机队伍的路径规划问题。任务的目标是探测到目标,通知地面基站(BS)救援人员,并尽快在目标与BS之间形成通信中继链。这种需要同时满足探测和连通性要求的任务可以通过以下方式进行规划:(1)具有连通性约束的单一目标优化问题;(ii)任务和连通性需求共同优化的多目标优化问题,或(iii)任务和连通性任务相互解耦优化。联合和解耦方法在任务时间、连通性、成本和/或实施方面都有优点。在本文中,我们从任务和连通性的角度比较了选定的联合和解耦多无人机路径规划方法。我们从两个角度说明了性能指标之间的权衡,并表明根据可用资源(例如,无人机数量)和搜索区域,最合适的规划器可以改变。然后,我们提出了一种混合规划器,对搜索无人机使用联合优化,对中继无人机使用解耦优化。因此,该方案具有灵活性,因为它允许使用不同的搜索路径规划器和连接明智的更好的任务前计划。分析表明,当无人机数量足够时,混合方案具有更好的连通性和总任务时间,但在搜索无人机数量很少的情况下,由于保留无人机进行中继,混合方案的任务时间比联合方案要长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ad Hoc Networks
Ad Hoc Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Ad Hoc Networks is an international and archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in ad hoc and sensor networking areas. The Ad Hoc Networks considers original, high quality and unpublished contributions addressing all aspects of ad hoc and sensor networks. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: Mobile and Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Sensor Networks Wireless Local and Personal Area Networks Home Networks Ad Hoc Networks of Autonomous Intelligent Systems Novel Architectures for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Self-organizing Network Architectures and Protocols Transport Layer Protocols Routing protocols (unicast, multicast, geocast, etc.) Media Access Control Techniques Error Control Schemes Power-Aware, Low-Power and Energy-Efficient Designs Synchronization and Scheduling Issues Mobility Management Mobility-Tolerant Communication Protocols Location Tracking and Location-based Services Resource and Information Management Security and Fault-Tolerance Issues Hardware and Software Platforms, Systems, and Testbeds Experimental and Prototype Results Quality-of-Service Issues Cross-Layer Interactions Scalability Issues Performance Analysis and Simulation of Protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书