EFL Instructors’ Micro-Scaffolding in Writing Classrooms: The Case of Wollega University, Ethiopia

Nesibu Gudina Dinagde, Melaku Wakuma
{"title":"EFL Instructors’ Micro-Scaffolding in Writing Classrooms: The Case of Wollega University, Ethiopia","authors":"Nesibu Gudina Dinagde, Melaku Wakuma","doi":"10.22202/tus.2023.v9i1.6654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed at measuring the extent to which EFL teachers provide assistance to their students in classroom interactions by writing lessons of Communicative English Language Skills II at the micro level of scaffolding. Case study design was used to achieve the objective of the study. Data was gathered from six English instructors of Wollega University who were selected purposively. The teachers were video recorded while teaching writing lessons. Then the data were transcribed into text. Next, interactional extracts were identified and coded for contingency using van de Poll's (2012) model of contingency shift framework (CSF) and the results were quantified by frequency and percentages. The finding indicated that the teachers began an interaction with high level of control in most interactions, which hinders them to identify their students’ actual knowledge level. Most of their interactions in the writing classroom became noncontingent and partially contingent. Dominantly, the study reviled that in longer interactions, which could help learners to construct knowledge, teachers were not able to adjust their interactional moves according to the students’ understanding level. Thus, it was concluded that EFL teachers were not properly scaffolding the development of students’ learning. This urges teachers to give attention to the concept of scaffolding in their teaching to provide proper assistance for their learners in classroom interactions.","PeriodicalId":52932,"journal":{"name":"Tellus Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tellus Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2023.v9i1.6654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed at measuring the extent to which EFL teachers provide assistance to their students in classroom interactions by writing lessons of Communicative English Language Skills II at the micro level of scaffolding. Case study design was used to achieve the objective of the study. Data was gathered from six English instructors of Wollega University who were selected purposively. The teachers were video recorded while teaching writing lessons. Then the data were transcribed into text. Next, interactional extracts were identified and coded for contingency using van de Poll's (2012) model of contingency shift framework (CSF) and the results were quantified by frequency and percentages. The finding indicated that the teachers began an interaction with high level of control in most interactions, which hinders them to identify their students’ actual knowledge level. Most of their interactions in the writing classroom became noncontingent and partially contingent. Dominantly, the study reviled that in longer interactions, which could help learners to construct knowledge, teachers were not able to adjust their interactional moves according to the students’ understanding level. Thus, it was concluded that EFL teachers were not properly scaffolding the development of students’ learning. This urges teachers to give attention to the concept of scaffolding in their teaching to provide proper assistance for their learners in classroom interactions.
英语教师在写作课堂上的微型支架——以埃塞俄比亚沃勒加大学为例
本研究旨在衡量EFL教师通过在脚手架的微观层面上编写《交际英语语言技能II》课程,在课堂互动中为学生提供帮助的程度。采用案例研究设计来达到研究目的。数据是从Wollega大学的六名英语教师那里收集的,他们是有目的地被选中的。老师们在教授写作课时被录了下来。然后数据被转录成文本。接下来,使用van de Poll(2012)的权变转移框架(CSF)模型,对交互提取进行权变识别和编码,并通过频率和百分比对结果进行量化。研究结果表明,在大多数互动中,教师开始的互动具有高度的控制力,这阻碍了他们识别学生的实际知识水平。他们在写作课堂上的大多数互动都变得非接触式和部分偶然性。该研究主要指出,在可以帮助学习者构建知识的长时间互动中,教师无法根据学生的理解水平调整他们的互动动作。因此,得出的结论是,外语教师没有适当地支撑学生学习的发展。这促使教师在教学中注意脚手架的概念,以便在课堂互动中为学习者提供适当的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信