Communism and communists towards the intelligentsia in interwar Poland. An outline of the issue

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Echa Przeszlosci Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.31648/ep.9303
Karol Sacewicz
{"title":"Communism and communists towards the intelligentsia in interwar Poland. An outline of the issue","authors":"Karol Sacewicz","doi":"10.31648/ep.9303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a section of the Comintern and a de facto Soviet agent, the Communist Workers’ Party of Poland (CWPP), and subsequently the Communist Party of Poland (CPP), aimed to effect a revolt of the masses—a revolution—which would culminate in making the dictatorship of the proletariat a reality. Holding hegemonic power, the Communists would thus be able to carry out Moscow’s imperial plans in the guise of Communist slogans and ideals. In that struggle, the communist party active on the territory of the Second Republic of Poland, as well as all sections of the Comintern, relied primarily on the working masses, on the proletariat, and with time found support among the landless and rural smallholders: groups which were susceptible to the most extreme revolutionary slogans. Or was there a place for another force, namely the intelligentsia? What positions with regard to the latter were adopted by the Bolsheviks in Russia, the principal ideologists of the Soviet mir and, by virtue of the CWPP/CPP’s subordination to Moscow, by the communist parties in Poland? This is precisely what this text is concerned with: the varying, fairly flexible policy of the communists towards the intelligentsia, which nonetheless was always calculated to serve the interests and goals of Moscow. One rather important detail should be noted here. The intelligentsia in question was neither a homogeneous group in terms of its social, political or economic views nor was it a national or religious monolith; on the contrary, it was characterized by numerous dividing lines, which is why applying a uniform yardstick to assess its attitudes towards communism and vice versa would be erroneous. Hence, this study only outlines and critically discusses the chief directions adopted by the communist party in its treatment of the intelligentsia, as well as the selected modalities of the latter’s approach to communism: from negation, through conformist subservience, to total subordination. All the same, it is merely a voice in the scholarly debate that should continue.","PeriodicalId":36993,"journal":{"name":"Echa Przeszlosci","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echa Przeszlosci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31648/ep.9303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a section of the Comintern and a de facto Soviet agent, the Communist Workers’ Party of Poland (CWPP), and subsequently the Communist Party of Poland (CPP), aimed to effect a revolt of the masses—a revolution—which would culminate in making the dictatorship of the proletariat a reality. Holding hegemonic power, the Communists would thus be able to carry out Moscow’s imperial plans in the guise of Communist slogans and ideals. In that struggle, the communist party active on the territory of the Second Republic of Poland, as well as all sections of the Comintern, relied primarily on the working masses, on the proletariat, and with time found support among the landless and rural smallholders: groups which were susceptible to the most extreme revolutionary slogans. Or was there a place for another force, namely the intelligentsia? What positions with regard to the latter were adopted by the Bolsheviks in Russia, the principal ideologists of the Soviet mir and, by virtue of the CWPP/CPP’s subordination to Moscow, by the communist parties in Poland? This is precisely what this text is concerned with: the varying, fairly flexible policy of the communists towards the intelligentsia, which nonetheless was always calculated to serve the interests and goals of Moscow. One rather important detail should be noted here. The intelligentsia in question was neither a homogeneous group in terms of its social, political or economic views nor was it a national or religious monolith; on the contrary, it was characterized by numerous dividing lines, which is why applying a uniform yardstick to assess its attitudes towards communism and vice versa would be erroneous. Hence, this study only outlines and critically discusses the chief directions adopted by the communist party in its treatment of the intelligentsia, as well as the selected modalities of the latter’s approach to communism: from negation, through conformist subservience, to total subordination. All the same, it is merely a voice in the scholarly debate that should continue.
共产主义和共产主义者对两次世界大战期间波兰知识分子的态度。问题概述
作为共产国际的一部分和事实上的苏联代理人,波兰共产主义工人党(CWPP),以及随后的波兰共产党(CPP),旨在发动群众起义——一场革命——最终使无产阶级独裁成为现实。共产党掌握了霸权,就可以打着共产党的口号和理想的幌子来执行莫斯科的帝国计划。在那场斗争中,活跃在波兰第二共和国领土上的共产党,以及共产国际的所有部门,主要依靠劳动群众和无产阶级,随着时间的推移,在无地和农村小农户中找到了支持:这些群体容易受到最极端的革命口号的影响。或者,还有另一种力量,即知识分子的容身之地吗?俄罗斯的布尔什维克,苏联的主要思想家,以及由于CWPP/CPP服从莫斯科,波兰的共产党对后者采取了什么立场?这正是本文所关注的:共产主义者对知识分子的不同、相当灵活的政策,尽管如此,这始终是为了服务于莫斯科的利益和目标。这里需要注意一个相当重要的细节。就其社会、政治或经济观点而言,知识界既不是一个同质的群体,也不是一个民族或宗教的整体;相反,它有许多分界线,这就是为什么用统一的标准来评估它对共产主义的态度,反之亦然是错误的。因此,本研究仅概述并批判性地讨论了共产党在对待知识分子时所采取的主要方向,以及后者对待共产主义的方式:从否定,到顺从,再到完全服从。尽管如此,它只是学术辩论中的一个声音,应该继续下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Echa Przeszlosci
Echa Przeszlosci Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信