Efficiency of matrix rhythm therapy on pain, strength, and quality of life in forward neck posture: A randomized controlled trial
IF 0.1
Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
V. Naik, Mayuri Kerkar, Sazney Mascarenhas
{"title":"Efficiency of matrix rhythm therapy on pain, strength, and quality of life in forward neck posture: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"V. Naik, Mayuri Kerkar, Sazney Mascarenhas","doi":"10.4103/jss.jss_102_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine and compare the effects of the Dynamic Exercise Program (DEP) and matrix rhythm therapy (MaRhyThe©) along with conventional physiotherapy in asymptomatic subjects with forward head posture (FHP) on a craniovertebral angle (CVA), strength, pain, and quality of life (QoL) using CVA, pressure biofeedback unit, pain algometer, and short form (SF-36), respectively. Methodology: Sixty-five people were screened for the study, of which 30 were included (18 females and 12 males) who participated in the study. The study participants were randomly allocated to Group A (DEP) or Group B (MaRhyThe©). Preintervention outcome measures used were CVA for the neck position, a craniocervical flexion endurance test for strength, a pain algometer for pain pressure threshold, and SF-36 for QoL. Postintervention outcome measures were recorded on the 6th day after intervention. Results: Data were analyzed descriptively with a priori establishment of success criteria of P < 0.05. Within-group analysis of both groups demonstrated statistically significant parameters of CVA, strength, and pain as P < 0.05. Between groups analysis demonstrated Group B to be statistically significant in all the outcome measures CVA (P < 0.0001), strength (P < 0.0001), and pain (P < 0.0001). SF-36 showed a positive effect on some subdomains as to emotional well-being (0.0320) and pain (0.0047*). Conclusion: It was determined that both deep exercise programs and MaRhyThe© when combined with conventional physiotherapy are effective in treating FHP. However, MaRhyThe© with conventional physiotherapy was found to be superior in reducing pain and improving range of motion, strength, and QoL.","PeriodicalId":55681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Scientific Society","volume":"49 1","pages":"331 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Scientific Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jss.jss_102_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine and compare the effects of the Dynamic Exercise Program (DEP) and matrix rhythm therapy (MaRhyThe©) along with conventional physiotherapy in asymptomatic subjects with forward head posture (FHP) on a craniovertebral angle (CVA), strength, pain, and quality of life (QoL) using CVA, pressure biofeedback unit, pain algometer, and short form (SF-36), respectively. Methodology: Sixty-five people were screened for the study, of which 30 were included (18 females and 12 males) who participated in the study. The study participants were randomly allocated to Group A (DEP) or Group B (MaRhyThe©). Preintervention outcome measures used were CVA for the neck position, a craniocervical flexion endurance test for strength, a pain algometer for pain pressure threshold, and SF-36 for QoL. Postintervention outcome measures were recorded on the 6th day after intervention. Results: Data were analyzed descriptively with a priori establishment of success criteria of P < 0.05. Within-group analysis of both groups demonstrated statistically significant parameters of CVA, strength, and pain as P < 0.05. Between groups analysis demonstrated Group B to be statistically significant in all the outcome measures CVA (P < 0.0001), strength (P < 0.0001), and pain (P < 0.0001). SF-36 showed a positive effect on some subdomains as to emotional well-being (0.0320) and pain (0.0047*). Conclusion: It was determined that both deep exercise programs and MaRhyThe© when combined with conventional physiotherapy are effective in treating FHP. However, MaRhyThe© with conventional physiotherapy was found to be superior in reducing pain and improving range of motion, strength, and QoL.
矩阵节律疗法对前颈姿势疼痛、力量和生活质量的疗效:一项随机对照试验
目的:确定并比较动态运动计划(DEP)和矩阵节律疗法(MaRhyThe©)以及常规物理疗法对无症状前头姿势(FHP)受试者颅椎角(CVA)、力量、疼痛和生活质量(QoL)的影响,分别使用CVA、压力生物反馈单元、疼痛测量仪和短表(SF-36)。方法:65人被筛选为研究对象,其中30人(18名女性和12名男性)参与了研究。研究参与者被随机分为A组(DEP)和B组(MaRhyThe©)。使用的干预前结果测量是颈部位置的CVA,强度的颅颈屈曲耐力测试,痛压阈值的疼痛测量仪和生活质量的SF-36。干预后结果测量于干预后第6天记录。结果:对数据进行描述性分析,先验建立成功标准P < 0.05。组内分析两组CVA、力量、疼痛参数均有统计学意义,P < 0.05。组间分析显示,B组在CVA (P < 0.0001)、强度(P < 0.0001)和疼痛(P < 0.0001)的所有结局指标上均具有统计学意义。SF-36对情绪幸福感(0.0320 *)和疼痛感(0.0047*)有正向影响。结论:深度运动方案和MaRhyThe©联合常规理疗对FHP均有较好的治疗效果。然而,采用常规物理疗法的MaRhyThe©在减轻疼痛、改善活动范围、力量和生活质量方面表现优异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。