{"title":"Seeding Community Intermediary Organizations and the Liability of Growth in Obtaining Local Giving","authors":"Xiaoyun Wang","doi":"10.1080/15309576.2023.2169476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Over the past 50 years, philanthropic institutions and governments have invested millions of dollars to support the growth of community intermediary organizations (CIOs) for developing vibrant civic lives. CIOs are community-based nonprofit organizations that do not directly deliver services but support other local nonprofit organizations. The key issue for these investments is how to generate more local giving for CIOs to reduce their dependence on external funders. It is believed that CIOs established in wealthy communities are more likely to attract local giving. However, an investigation into community foundations—a type of CIOs—seeded by a funder shows that foundations in the wealthiest communities did not receive much local giving. Rapid population growth in wealthy communities disrupted conventional, close-knit social relations and undermined the efficacy of foundations’ traditional fundraising model that relied on personal relationship-building, local brokers, and word-of-mouth referrals to attract giving. Community foundations suffered from low visibility and lost competitive advantages over commercial and national competitors. It suggests that funders should pay more attention to increasing volatility in communities and help CIOs transform their fundraising model.","PeriodicalId":47571,"journal":{"name":"Public Performance & Management Review","volume":"46 1","pages":"666 - 690"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Performance & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2169476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract Over the past 50 years, philanthropic institutions and governments have invested millions of dollars to support the growth of community intermediary organizations (CIOs) for developing vibrant civic lives. CIOs are community-based nonprofit organizations that do not directly deliver services but support other local nonprofit organizations. The key issue for these investments is how to generate more local giving for CIOs to reduce their dependence on external funders. It is believed that CIOs established in wealthy communities are more likely to attract local giving. However, an investigation into community foundations—a type of CIOs—seeded by a funder shows that foundations in the wealthiest communities did not receive much local giving. Rapid population growth in wealthy communities disrupted conventional, close-knit social relations and undermined the efficacy of foundations’ traditional fundraising model that relied on personal relationship-building, local brokers, and word-of-mouth referrals to attract giving. Community foundations suffered from low visibility and lost competitive advantages over commercial and national competitors. It suggests that funders should pay more attention to increasing volatility in communities and help CIOs transform their fundraising model.
期刊介绍:
Public Performance & Management Review (PPMR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal that addresses a broad array of influential factors on the performance of public and nonprofit organizations. Its objectives are to: Advance theories on public governance, public management, and public performance; Facilitate the development of innovative techniques and to encourage a wider application of those already established; Stimulate research and critical thinking about the relationship between public and private management theories; Present integrated analyses of theories, concepts, strategies, and techniques dealing with performance, measurement, and related questions of organizational efficacy; and Provide a forum for practitioner-academic exchange. Continuing themes include, but are not limited to: managing for results, measuring and evaluating performance, designing accountability systems, improving budget strategies, managing human resources, building partnerships, facilitating citizen participation, applying new technologies, and improving public sector services and outcomes. Published since 1975, Public Performance & Management Review is a highly respected journal, receiving international ranking. Scholars and practitioners recognize it as a leading journal in the field of public administration.