The Effects of Animistic Thinking, Animistic Cues, and Superstitions on Brand Responses on Social Media

IF 6.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Malgorzata Karpinska-Krakowiak , Martin Eisend
{"title":"The Effects of Animistic Thinking, Animistic Cues, and Superstitions on Brand Responses on Social Media","authors":"Malgorzata Karpinska-Krakowiak ,&nbsp;Martin Eisend","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2021.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although marketers have been using various message tactics to breathe life into their brands, the concepts of animism and animistic cues, particularly in social media marketing, have received little theoretical and empirical attention. Therefore, we conducted two studies to uncover what drives animistic thinking on social media, how animism is linked to anthropomorphism, how animism can benefit brands online, and what the boundary conditions for this phenomenon are. The findings demonstrate that animistic (vs. non-animistic) cues elicit animistic thinking, which leads to more favorable brand evaluations. This effect is moderated by superstitious beliefs. The results provide new knowledge for both marketing researchers and practitioners, revealing that it is easier to activate animism than anthropomorphism on social media and that such activation can be done via easily devisable cues (such as simple movement), particularly when addressing highly superstitious consumers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48260,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 104-117"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.03.002","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996821000189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Although marketers have been using various message tactics to breathe life into their brands, the concepts of animism and animistic cues, particularly in social media marketing, have received little theoretical and empirical attention. Therefore, we conducted two studies to uncover what drives animistic thinking on social media, how animism is linked to anthropomorphism, how animism can benefit brands online, and what the boundary conditions for this phenomenon are. The findings demonstrate that animistic (vs. non-animistic) cues elicit animistic thinking, which leads to more favorable brand evaluations. This effect is moderated by superstitious beliefs. The results provide new knowledge for both marketing researchers and practitioners, revealing that it is easier to activate animism than anthropomorphism on social media and that such activation can be done via easily devisable cues (such as simple movement), particularly when addressing highly superstitious consumers.

动漫思维、动漫暗示和迷信对社交媒体上品牌反应的影响
尽管营销人员一直在使用各种信息策略为他们的品牌注入活力,但泛灵论和泛灵暗示的概念,特别是在社交媒体营销中,很少受到理论和实证的关注。因此,我们进行了两项研究,以揭示是什么驱动了社交媒体上的万物有灵论思维,万物有灵论如何与拟人化联系在一起,万物有灵论如何使在线品牌受益,以及这种现象的边界条件是什么。研究结果表明,泛灵论(与非泛灵论)线索会引发泛灵论思维,从而导致更有利的品牌评价。这种影响被迷信所缓和。研究结果为市场研究人员和从业者提供了新的知识,揭示了在社交媒体上激活万物有灵论比激活拟人论更容易,这种激活可以通过容易设计的线索(如简单的动作)来完成,特别是在面对高度迷信的消费者时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interactive Marketing aims to explore and discuss issues in the dynamic field of interactive marketing, encompassing both online and offline topics related to analyzing, targeting, and serving individual customers. The journal seeks to publish innovative, high-quality research that presents original results, methodologies, theories, and applications in interactive marketing. Manuscripts should address current or emerging managerial challenges and have the potential to influence both practice and theory in the field. The journal welcomes conceptually rigorous approaches of any type and does not favor or exclude specific methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信