Socio-cultural definition of intercultural dialogue in the concept of Mary Douglas

N. Kryvda, S. Storozhuk
{"title":"Socio-cultural definition of intercultural dialogue in the concept of Mary Douglas","authors":"N. Kryvda, S. Storozhuk","doi":"10.34017/1313-9703-2022-1(19)-2(20)-40-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research is aimed at uncovering the distinctiveness of the culture types (or communities) identified by Mary Douglas, and at determining the extent of inner willingness for intercultural communication of the representatives of those culture types. The authors are motivated by the inadequacy of the prevailing in modern intellectual discourse division of societies into \"open\" and “closed\" ones. In particular, they emphasize that the global tendency of societies towards openness should have led to an emergence of Kant's citizen of the world, but instead it led to an increase of cultural intolerance and an exacerbation of intercultural conflicts. In view of this, the typology of societies conceptualized in Karl Popper's works needs significant reexamination, expansion, and clarification; the intellectual work of Mary Douglas accomplishes this goal in its own way. Mary Douglas's scientific work, in particular her concept of “grid/group\" can become a theoretical foundation for the study of problems and contradictions of intercultural communication. The \"cultural map”, proposed by the researcher, makes it possible to determine the level of openness of the representatives of a certain cultural environment to intercultural communication, and to predict its effectiveness and its consequences. In addition, the concept of “grid/group”, developed by the researcher, can become a useful theoretical basis for the study of \"cultural intelligence”. Evaluation of social structuring and categorization from the standpoint of Durkheim's approach enabled Mary Douglas to demonstrate the particulars of formation and maintenance of cultural boundaries by means of ritual and to form an original \"cultural map\", identifying four extreme types of social communities with a clear internal structure. The latter organizes the social and cultural experience of each member of the community, determining the characteristics of his or her behavior, including the willingness for intercultural interaction. In the works of Mary Douglas, it manifests itself not only and not so much as an individual’s personal mood, but as a specific and predetermined social program of interaction with representatives of other cultural environments, that is, a kind of mental directive. It determines the characteristics of individual behavior of each person; meaning, it becomes a schematic marker of a person's cultural affiliation, thus facilitating the understanding of cultural differences and motivation of a person in a group.","PeriodicalId":56204,"journal":{"name":"Idei","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Idei","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34017/1313-9703-2022-1(19)-2(20)-40-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research is aimed at uncovering the distinctiveness of the culture types (or communities) identified by Mary Douglas, and at determining the extent of inner willingness for intercultural communication of the representatives of those culture types. The authors are motivated by the inadequacy of the prevailing in modern intellectual discourse division of societies into "open" and “closed" ones. In particular, they emphasize that the global tendency of societies towards openness should have led to an emergence of Kant's citizen of the world, but instead it led to an increase of cultural intolerance and an exacerbation of intercultural conflicts. In view of this, the typology of societies conceptualized in Karl Popper's works needs significant reexamination, expansion, and clarification; the intellectual work of Mary Douglas accomplishes this goal in its own way. Mary Douglas's scientific work, in particular her concept of “grid/group" can become a theoretical foundation for the study of problems and contradictions of intercultural communication. The "cultural map”, proposed by the researcher, makes it possible to determine the level of openness of the representatives of a certain cultural environment to intercultural communication, and to predict its effectiveness and its consequences. In addition, the concept of “grid/group”, developed by the researcher, can become a useful theoretical basis for the study of "cultural intelligence”. Evaluation of social structuring and categorization from the standpoint of Durkheim's approach enabled Mary Douglas to demonstrate the particulars of formation and maintenance of cultural boundaries by means of ritual and to form an original "cultural map", identifying four extreme types of social communities with a clear internal structure. The latter organizes the social and cultural experience of each member of the community, determining the characteristics of his or her behavior, including the willingness for intercultural interaction. In the works of Mary Douglas, it manifests itself not only and not so much as an individual’s personal mood, but as a specific and predetermined social program of interaction with representatives of other cultural environments, that is, a kind of mental directive. It determines the characteristics of individual behavior of each person; meaning, it becomes a schematic marker of a person's cultural affiliation, thus facilitating the understanding of cultural differences and motivation of a person in a group.
玛丽·道格拉斯概念中跨文化对话的社会文化定义
这项研究旨在揭示玛丽·道格拉斯所识别的文化类型(或社区)的独特性,并确定这些文化类型的代表内心对跨文化交流的意愿程度。作者的动机是现代知识话语中普遍存在的将社会划分为“开放”和“封闭”的不足特别是,他们强调,社会走向开放的全球趋势本应导致康德的世界公民的出现,但却导致了文化不容忍的增加和跨文化冲突的加剧。有鉴于此,卡尔·波普尔作品中概念化的社会类型学需要进行重大的重新审视、扩展和澄清阳离子;玛丽·道格拉斯的智力工作以自己的方式实现了这一目标。玛丽·道格拉斯的科学工作,特别是她的“网格/群体”概念,可以成为研究跨文化交际问题和矛盾的理论基础,并预测其有效性及其后果。此外,研究人员提出了“网格/组”的概念,从涂尔干的方法对社会结构和分类进行评价,使玛丽·道格拉斯能够通过仪式的方式展示文化边界的形成和维持的细节,并形成一幅独创的“文化地图”“,确定了四种具有明确内部结构的极端类型的社会社区。后者组织了社区中每个成员的社会和文化体验,决定了他或她的行为特征,包括跨文化互动的意愿。在玛丽·道格拉斯的作品中,它不仅表现出来,而且表现出来的是个人的情绪d、 而是作为一种特定的、预先确定的与其他文化环境代表互动的社会程序,即一种心理指导。它决定了每个人的个人行为特征;意思是,它成为一个人文化归属的示意性标志,从而有助于理解一个人在群体中的文化差异和动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信