Against the Flow of Time with Multi-Output Models

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
J. Jakubík, Mary Phuong, M. Chvosteková, A. Krakovská
{"title":"Against the Flow of Time with Multi-Output Models","authors":"J. Jakubík, Mary Phuong, M. Chvosteková, A. Krakovská","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4157513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent work has paid close attention to the first principle of Granger causality, according to which cause precedes effect. In this context, the question may arise whether the detected direction of causality also reverses after the time reversal of unidirectionally coupled data. Recently, it has been shown that for unidirectionally causally connected autoregressive (AR) processes X → Y, after time reversal of data, the opposite causal direction Y → X is indeed detected, although typically as part of the bidirectional X ↔ Y link. As we argue here, the answer is different when the measured data are not from AR processes but from linked deterministic systems. When the goal is the usual forward data analysis, cross-mapping-like approaches correctly detect X → Y, while Granger causality-like approaches, which should not be used for deterministic time series, detect causal independence X ⫫ Y . The results of backward causal analysis depend on the predictability of the reversed data. Unlike AR processes, observables from deterministic dynamical systems, even complex nonlinear ones, can be predicted well forward, while backward predictions can be difficult (notably when the time reversal of a function leads to one-to-many relations). To address this problem, we propose an approach based on models that provide multiple candidate predictions for the target, combined with a loss function that consideres only the best candidate. The resulting good forward and backward predictability supports the view that unidirectionally causally linked deterministic dynamical systems X → Y can be expected to detect the same link both before and after time reversal.","PeriodicalId":49848,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Science Review","volume":"23 1","pages":"175 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4157513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Recent work has paid close attention to the first principle of Granger causality, according to which cause precedes effect. In this context, the question may arise whether the detected direction of causality also reverses after the time reversal of unidirectionally coupled data. Recently, it has been shown that for unidirectionally causally connected autoregressive (AR) processes X → Y, after time reversal of data, the opposite causal direction Y → X is indeed detected, although typically as part of the bidirectional X ↔ Y link. As we argue here, the answer is different when the measured data are not from AR processes but from linked deterministic systems. When the goal is the usual forward data analysis, cross-mapping-like approaches correctly detect X → Y, while Granger causality-like approaches, which should not be used for deterministic time series, detect causal independence X ⫫ Y . The results of backward causal analysis depend on the predictability of the reversed data. Unlike AR processes, observables from deterministic dynamical systems, even complex nonlinear ones, can be predicted well forward, while backward predictions can be difficult (notably when the time reversal of a function leads to one-to-many relations). To address this problem, we propose an approach based on models that provide multiple candidate predictions for the target, combined with a loss function that consideres only the best candidate. The resulting good forward and backward predictability supports the view that unidirectionally causally linked deterministic dynamical systems X → Y can be expected to detect the same link both before and after time reversal.
利用多输出模型对抗时间流
最近的研究关注了格兰杰因果关系的第一原理,根据这一原理,原因先于结果。在这种情况下,可能会出现一个问题,即在单向耦合数据的时间反转之后,检测到的因果关系方向是否也反转了。最近,有研究表明,对于单向因果关联的自回归(AR)过程X→Y,在数据的时间反转之后,确实检测到相反的因果方向Y→X,尽管通常是双向X↔Y环节的一部分。正如我们在这里讨论的,当测量的数据不是来自AR过程,而是来自相关的确定性系统时,答案就不同了。当目标是通常的前向数据分析时,类似交叉映射的方法可以正确地检测到X→Y,而类似格兰杰因果关系的方法(不应该用于确定性时间序列)可以检测到因果独立性X⫫Y。反向因果分析的结果取决于反向数据的可预测性。与AR过程不同,来自确定性动力系统的可观测值,甚至是复杂的非线性系统,都可以很好地向前预测,而向后预测可能很困难(特别是当函数的时间反转导致一对多关系时)。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种基于模型的方法,该模型为目标提供了多个候选预测,并结合了只考虑最佳候选的损失函数。由此产生的良好的正向和向后可预测性支持了这样一种观点,即单向因果关联的确定性动力系统X→Y可以在时间反转之前和之后检测到相同的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Measurement Science Review
Measurement Science Review INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: - theory of measurement - mathematical processing of measured data - measurement uncertainty minimisation - statistical methods in data evaluation and modelling - measurement as an interdisciplinary activity - measurement science in education - medical imaging methods, image processing - biosignal measurement, processing and analysis - model based biomeasurements - neural networks in biomeasurement - telemeasurement in biomedicine - measurement in nanomedicine - measurement of basic physical quantities - magnetic and electric fields measurements - measurement of geometrical and mechanical quantities - optical measuring methods - electromagnetic compatibility - measurement in material science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信